this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
58 points (77.9% liked)

๐Ÿฆ‹ Bluesky Social

306 readers
1 users here now

Bluesky is a federated social network built on ATProtocol.

Rules:

  1. Follow lemm.ee's site-wide rules.
  2. All posts must, in some way, relate to Bluesky or ATProto.
  3. Do not make duplicate posts.
  4. Do not post x.com links.

Useful Links:

News, discussion, and memes are all allowed here.

See also:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

On this occasion, Kamala Harris used her own Web Domain compared to Barack Obama who for now uses the nickname under the .bsky.social umbrella

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone please stop giving that woman news coverage. She is another neoliberal failure who should stay in the dustbin of history.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If I thought this were notable, I wouldโ€™ve been the one to make a post about it

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Notably, her team knows how to use DNS, unlike Obamaโ€™s

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Perhaps because Team Obama isn't as active, as he's now a former president.

Harris is a candidate who could run for governor of California or for president again, so going to Bluesky is a way to stand out.

Also, Team Harris likely received training on how DNS works in Bluesky from the Democratic Party.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

/sigh - they're gonna run her again, ~~and she's gonna lose again and I'm not happy about it.~~ eh, maybe not...tariffs are gonna hurt R's pretty hard...

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

there is time for primaries, no need for rushed appointments

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Primaries for dems have always been a vague formality. They've already decided who's going to take the next ones.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why Clinton won in 2008.

Oh wait...

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Exactly, that's why she "won" the Democratic primaries in 2016. Same reason she didn't win in 2008 - they already chose who was going to win, and she wasn't it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah but instead of pushing through a candidate who struggled to connect with voters, maybe we push for a candidate who has things going in the right direction between them and voters.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Even if they win the presidency (if there are even still free and fair elections by that point), a candidate like Harris will depress voter turnout and leave America with a lame duck or Republican Congress like in 2024. You want fascists for 2032? Because that's how you get fascists for 2032. And that's if the country doesn't get halfway there by 2032 entirely through Democratic inaction.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There's a chance he could lose, but before that, there are the primaries, and he must go through that process. But before that, there are the congressional midterm elections, and that's when we'll see the changes.

But there are cases where a Republican president wins the election, but Congress is Democratic. If JD Vance wins, I'd like Congress to be Democratic and have a supermajority; it would be a way to control the election.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So far it has 41 thousand followers

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Must be nice to be a famous person, I can't even get 2 likes on a post on Bluesky, but she can get 41k followers in a matter of hours :(

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This is a step in the right direction. Now do mastodon.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Wow! Who cares!?