this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

38917 readers
180 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, so it's an encrypted, open source whistle-blowing feature in their app / system.

The article is light on technical details but if it makes whistleblowing easier and safer than for example emailing their editors that's probably a good thing.

[–] PenguinTD 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But like the ice tracker, wouldn't download and use the app expose the potential user lists to surface if local authority can ask for such information?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they are bundling this into their regular app, so they'd have to put every guardian read on the list😅

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, that's the point described in the linked paper - traffic goes via the same domains used for their app, and the messenger is embedded in their app

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not only that, but every app will constantly appear to be sending messages, so real messages are greatly obfuscated. That's honestly the real innovative part of the product IMHO.

[–] PenguinTD 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

that's really cool. Does the message part work as regular p2p message app?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No it's a bit complex. The transmissions are sent constantly at regular intervals and are a very specific size and are then combined later. So it's not "instant" messaging. It's closer to email.

[–] PenguinTD 1 points 2 weeks ago

So encrypted, periodical interval to mask out any incoming/out going variance in traffic I wonder how they mitigate the backend part as there might be a ton of wasted traffic to hide the actual traffic. since they obviously need a lot of users to hide the whistle blower, but that also mean their backend needs to be pretty smart to handle lots of traffic and still consume energy to decrypt and then throw away the "noise" data.