this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryArtifacts

736 readers
113 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You see these tools of battle and think how close people had to be to each other to use them. Knowing that either you or someone else is getting their head smashed in. You are one of many getting your head smashed in, face to face.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then someone from 2 meters away pokes a spear into your side.

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And you very likely did not have access to antibiotics.

[–] f314@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These weapons were a response to increasing amounts of armor. A sword was no longer an efficient sidearm against plate armor, so bludgeoning weapons took over. Spears, lances or similar long weapons were still the primary arms both on foot and on horse, though.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Ah, makes sense. Weve each arrive to our respective places on earth having had goodness knows how many ancestors avoid dying in these scenarios,

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Does it come with a notice? I don't know, it doesn't look very intuitive to use.

The notice: BONK