this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

49469 readers
629 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

feel free to list other window managers you've used.

I have been happy with bspwm, but considering trying something else. I love its simplicity and immense customizability. I like that it is shell scriptable, but it is not a deal breaker feature for me.

I like how the binary split model makes any custom partition possible.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Borgzilla 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not sure if this counts as a tiling window manager, but I spend most of my time in emacs in full screen mode. I can create, delete, resize, and swap my windows.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

That's what made me start using EXWM (Emacs X Window Manager). With Emacs you end up managing "windows" (that outside Emacs would be called "panes"). With EXWM Emacs really is your desktop, and X applications run inside its windows. So that meant I no longer had two windowing models to manage (Emacs and WM), just one. There was a lot to like about that.

But... Emacs as a window manager, and using your development environment as your window manager, has other issues. Especially restarting it becomes more onerous. So I went back to i3 and am very happy. With a few minor customizations I can integrate Emacs and i3 very comfortably.

But another Emacs point vis-à-vis window managers is many committed Emacs users, require only trivial functionality from our window managers. I usually have a web browser and an Emacs window and that's it, with occasionally something else running. I was pretty happy with Unity with crude tiling where I could split a conventional WM's screen into two.

The main reason I use i3 is it gives me access to easy customization and has a windowing model I can work with, and one day I should be able to migrate to sway on Wayland without much drama.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Are you aware that Emacs can be a full-featured window manager.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure my solution counts either - I just use quicktile with default KDE, because it has the tiling bits that I need and the config file was simple enough that I didn't have to spend a whole day setting it up. I need working memory for other things besides keyboard shortcuts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Sorry to be the boring i3 user but it's a rock solid TWM. Plus I am using the autotiling mod and now it's even better :D

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Starting with i3 as my first, i tried a bunch of different ones. Xmonad and Qtile were the ones i liked the most but Qtile was buggy and Xmonad while working was super confusing to configure with haskell.

Also tried AwesomeWM, it felt a bit buggy to me in terms of window handling and DWM was just too complicated to patch and even with patches it was too basic

Ended up going back to i3, and then moved over to Sway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

XMonad. Been using it for almost a decade, and very powerful. I3 I hear is also good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I prefer the way XMonad handles multimonitor workspaces, but left for Sway due to wayland support.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

need to give it a try. I'm stuck in the past times lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

You'll like Sway when you decide to make the Wayland transition.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

i3 and sway

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

i3 until the day I die

Edit: Why? Because I love how easy it is to get working, it's a nice balance between features and simplicity for me, and IPC features are great for some QoL plugins. Its configuration file format is simple enough, I like lua with wezterm and neovim but I don't really see the point with a WM, I just need to see my windows when I want, the way I want, and to switch to others.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pop!_OS 20.04 LTS... I love how it combines tiling and stacking. Sure I could use workspaces instead of stacks, but with stacks... I can use both!

I've also used EXWM and am going to give it another whirl after I upgrade to emacs 28 with native comp

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Does this support independent workspaces on each monitor? That's what kept me from using i3 on Plasma :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I really like dwm. It doesn't seem too popular so maybe the other ones are better but it was the first one I tried so the others feel weird to me. I like the idea behind suckless in general though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

i3 is what I've been using the past few years. I've tried others, but I always end back up with i3 as I've found nothing else to be as simple and efficient for my workflow, with 12 workspaces across 2 monitors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Sway with autotiling and a few nifty scripts (launch or focus and such) and Waybar. The combination of having scratchpads, sensible autotiling along with titlebars and the wonderful world of wayland is supreme.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm on Hyprland (wayland compositer, wl-roots based). Prior to the wayland transition I was on dwm. Hyprland offers a dynamic tiling layout just like dwm, which was my main selling point. The dev is very active and hyprland is gaining maturity rapidly (more than alternatives like dwl or river did at the time I checked it out). I also tried i3 and sway, but they don't quite cut it for me as they don't do dynamic tiling out of the box.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I wish Hyprland gets into the Fedora repos. I don't wanna have to deal with building stuff.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I usually use tiling add-ons for Gnome or KDE. So pop-shell or bismuth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I like i3, at some point when I finally move to Wayland I'll move to Sway. Going to try Hyprland as well though, 'cause why not

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I started with for a bit awm, however i am giving qtile a try since im learning how to code python so good practice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

This is perhaps cheating, but after diving deep into the hardcore tiling mangers (ratpoison, wmii, xmonad), I grew softer and stayed in awesome for a while, but eventually I realised that since all I want from tiling anyway is the ability to quickly place two windows beside each other, I might as well go with a DM that does all the other stuff I want automatically (mounting, monitors, etc.), and since KDE is now good again, and coming along on the tiling side, that's the tiling WM I'm using.

Yes, I said I was cheating ...!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

LeftWM, because it's a really nice community to get involved with, and i like rust so i contributed a bit to the project

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Recently I have been using river. It's extremely easy to configure via a shell script, and it's very fast and stable. It's another dwm clone

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's not exactly a dwm clone, it's way better than that. It takes all the best parts from dwm and bspwm, and I've been loving it so far

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I’ve been using i3. Nothing super advanced but the config is easy and being able to reload in place is nice

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used suckless ecosystem for 5+ years, but I wanted to use Wayland so now I'm transitioning into Sway and holymoly how fast and easy it is. So simple to configure and written in C.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@cyclohexane for me it was and always will be bspwm. Once I had it configured it was the coziest of cozies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Sway, but single window capture and the animations make hyprland very tempting...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My heart still belongs to enlightenment/e17 but I've been using i3 for the past few years, and then hyprland for the last 4 months or so. It's working out well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Man e16 was the shit. If it played nice with hot-plugging monitors, I'd still use it today. It had some awesome themes, too.

What's e17 like? I've truthfully never used it, though I daily Terminology as a terminal emulator.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

DWM due to it's suckless nature

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I've probed a few tiling wms: dwm: never ending tinkering, a lot of frustration and despair with incombatible patches. i3: manual tiling is not for me. spectrewm: nice, but too less features. xmonad: nice, but Haskell. Awesome: at first it was not my favourite, but it comes with most of the features I need. Missing features can be added in a short time (awesome is build from C and Lua, awesome's plugins are pretty simple lua scripts). Awesome is full operable via the mouse or the keyboard - awesome is able to act as a stacking window manager; a very handy feature, when coming from a stacking window manager (I've used icewm for twenty years). Summary: a very good tool to form a work environment that is adapted to your personal workflow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

EXWM. I am a longtime Emacs user so merging the concepts of Emacs buffers and X windows is a huge benefit. Only one set of keybindings to worry about, all of my Emacs window management stuff works for X windows too. One less external dependency to worry about too. In a new environment (like when starting a new job etc) as long as I have my Emacs config I am good to go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I've been very happy with hyprland since it's the only Wayland TWM that allows a great experience with nvidia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I tried i3 back in 2019 and I've been using it ever since on my desktop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i3 is the one I keep coming back to

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

What else have you tried, but didn't like?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I use sway because when I came back after a long break, it seemed to be the one to go with. I kind of miss awesome, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Today I use Plasma, but if I need a tiling wm I use awesome. It's so great and customizable. If you're fine with Lua, is easy to config.

load more comments
view more: next ›