this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
16 points (90.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7521 readers
794 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My only issue with the article is the reference to America as a first-world country. Crumbling and non-existent transportation infrastructure, a desperate workforce who can't survive on the wages they're paid, unaffordable housing, groceries, education and healthcare, and every day adults and children are getting shot by their community members. How can the US still be labeled "first-world"?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly we haven't (if ever) been a first world country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Transitioning to second world is more like it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What is left to transition to make the transformation into the second world complete? A violent political insurrection against the houses of government and interference in the democratic process by a sitting president? Check.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i hear ya... we suck... but i don't think we've gone full Russia just yet... thus i view it more as we are transitioning into a second world country. It's not happening over night... little by little these oligarchs are chipping away at all liberties and guardrails...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Yea, I see what you're saying. I don't even think we suck. I think those oligarchs you mentioned suck and it's disapoointing that all of the people I grew up with and knew are dead inside for one crapitalist, institutional. hegemonic reason or another.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Before anyone points out that everyone died at 25 or something like that, the low life expectancy had a lot to do with child and infant mortality. If you made it to adulthood, you had a decent chance of making to to 50 or 60, which isn't a modern life span, but it's better than most people realize.

And, as you point out, you spent more of your time living rather than just working. If I had almost twice the time with my loved ones while I was young, that might be a decent tradeoff for losing ten or twenty years later one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My company pushed for us to do 1,920 billable hours per year to meet our bonus goals. TIL I work significantly more than a medieval peasant.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

It's perverse that we had nearly exponential growth in automation since the industrial revolution, yet people are still working harder than ever. What is the point of having automation if it's not directed toward reducing the amount of labour people have to do in order to just exist.

load more comments
view more: next ›