this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Las Vegas Raiders

3 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Be completely honest and objective.

View Poll

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Its the guys 4th game. 2 different HC and OC. Let him grow for fucks sake

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If he maintains this level of play then traded. Cleanse the team of MCD's please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, almost anyone in the NFL has potential. However, the further we push along the more and more historical data suggests he’ll be what’s expected of a 4th round pick. Is it possible he has a resurgence like Gannon? Sure. That just means it’ll be for another team.

The team seems to gel around him, so that’s cool. They’ll just have to do a lot of compensating for his skill set. I still don’t think we bench him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Too early to tell

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A rookie in their first year isn't gonna have immediate results

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He has the potential to be about as good as Jimmy was with the Niners

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure he's the future or anything, but this instant gratification culture of giving a rookie QB like 4 games to determine if he's a franchise qb or not is just not good for anyone. Peyton Manning threw 28 INTs his first year and they stuck with him. Let him get some experience before we start asking these questions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No fucking idea. Nobody in here does or they would be employed by an NFL team...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think he's a backup which is absolutely fine for a 4th rounder. Backups play a shit ton in todays 17 game schedule