Admax

Your question is probably rethorical but I feel the need to put it out there : It's because it's been advertised as such. LLMs are not advertised as language based AI but as something "intelligent" with "reasoning" abilities, which they inherently do not have.

But that's not what most people were told. For a large amount of them, LLMs can "think" and should be able to solve problems, such as chess…

I have a rough idea of their efficiency as I've used them, not in professional settings but I wager it would not be too different.

My point is more that it feels like the rugs are finally starting to get pulled. This tech is functionnal as you said, it works to a point and that point is enough for a sizeable amount of people. But I doubt that the price most people are paying now is enough to cover the cost of answering their queries. Now that some people, especially younger devs or people who never worked without those tools are dependant on it, they can go ahead and charge more.

But it's not too late, so I'm hoping it will make some people more aware of that kind of scheme and that they will stop feeding the AI hype in general.

Can't comment on the code but the coloscheme of blue and orange, while eyecatching, can be a little… Agressive… So maybe they are talking about that.

Hopefully (?) this is the start of a trend and people might begin to realize how all those products are not worth their price and AI is an overhyped mess made to hook users before exploiting them...

Slowly, but surely, we are pushing pride to its final form : The Pride Year.

As it should be.

Why would you make two generations the same colors when you could have use any other color or distinguish them with the style of the line 💀

Okay but now I wanna hear about the economics of olive oil press in Roman Africa…

Some of them bricked high end cards at some point didn't they ?

Purely for educational purpose: how should a molotov be thrown ?
Why is a overhead thow a bad thing ?

I find this baffeling. Multiple people, on different topics did disagree with his campaigns promises, and voted for him against their best interest. (Farmers for exemple) Their justification ? "He won't do it". Are you telling me you are voting for someone who promises to do things, in the hope that he does all the other things but the one that would negatively impact you ? REALLY ?!

Beside the fact that some software are STILL not supporting it, what do people have against webp ?

This is the right way to read this