I think you're just too dim to understand. You brought race randomly into this. Now you cast NATO as some power to be feared. It's a defensive pack. Russia casts it as a boogeyman to justify invading it's neighbors. That would make you a Russian bootlicker.
ArchimedesTesseract
joined 3 years ago
They'll surely love Russia after getting invaded a second time. If alignment or invasion are their choices, Russia is really pushing them into NATO.
Seasame Credits. What else do you call them, race baiter?
That is when they invaded. Obama tried sanctions to dissuade Russia then. Biden will try some more. That runs counter to the Russian anti-NATO narrative. But the US is playing "peace in our time", and we all know how appeasement ends.
The idea that the NATO boogieman is behind popular protests is a common Russian propaganda talking point. NATO is just not sophisticated enough to engineer a mass uprising like the Maidan Revolution. If they had, don't you think their newly minted puppet government would have "invited" them in already, just like Russia did in Donbas?
It's not a joint strategy, necessarily. Chinese, I suspect, are simply paid in social credits for displays of fervent nationalism. But it's certainly cheap enough to pay a room of shills to repeat your talking points of the day. Even on remote outposts like lemmy. For a country with a weak economy and military like Russia, information war is the best bang for the buck.
Ukraine was a neutral buffer before Russia invaded. Seeing Russia dishonor Ukraine's sovereignty will push what's left of Ukraine into NATO. So Russia has basically forced NATO encroachment even closer than it was before. And that's not even counting Finland.
They'll only ask for the swab once you try and get your money out.
+1 for Metager
Thanks for the tip, comrade.
Neutral in what regard? Russia violated their sovereignty in annexing parts of their territory and in supporting militarily separatist movements. They've been forced into opposition by Russia's aggression.