Looks great!
Blaze
joined 1 week ago
Thank you!
they offer a lifetime warranty on their Pro wallets.
Good to know, thanks!
Thanks, they look nice! Do you have one yourself?
Reddit to Lemmy, easily
Isn't it Belgian?
It is, but at least the CEO does not make Nazi salutes
Firstly, [email protected] still has 2,500 subscribers, while [email protected] only has 1,500 at this point. Additionally, the moderators are now directing users to [email protected], which has even fewer subscribers (around 200), as mentioned in this post.
[email protected] is by far the most active community on this topic:
(https://lemmyverse.net/communities?query=tv+shows&order=active)
Subscribers are not a relevant metric as [email protected] was created during the API exodus, but a lot of people left since then. Active users is a better metric.
Rather than a clean transition, this situation has resulted in a fractured community.
I know, I am that mod. This decision is actually a way to consolidate the existing communities on that topic
So this is consolidation rather than fracturing. The first two communities have been locked. Should the mod team of [email protected] start to power trip, people can ask the lemm.ee admins to get one of the two others communities back and move there.
Secondly, in this case, the issue was malicious moderation. Users left because of bad mod behavior, but the real concern remains: admins have the final say. If an admin decides to power trip, the entire community—and potentially the whole instance—falls under their control.
[email protected] was created as an alternative from power tripping admins on strartrek.website, and is now the most active community about Star Trek. So even power tripping admins can be dealt with. @[email protected] can attest.
In contrast, a decentralized approach with similar communities on different instances offers a natural fail-safe. If one instance becomes problematic, users can easily regroup on other similar communities rather than having to start from scratch. This ensures continuity and resilience rather than the all-or-nothing risk of centralization.
You can have alternative communities locked, so that they are ready to be used, but still keep the conversations happening on the main community.
Whether or not this happens depends on developer support
Indeed, but it is not implemented at the moment. Should the mods of /r/BuyfromEU ask us which Lemmy community we want to add to their sidebar, which one should give them? Should we give them the 4 of them just because we can't decide on one?
The question isn’t whether consolidation is the only way to improve discussion efficiency—it’s whether it’s the best way. And given the risks of power concentration, it seems clear that a better solution lies in improving the tools rather than weakening decentralization.
Where are the alternative active communities to
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
People don't want to shout into the void. They go where the people are. Another example:
- https://feddit.nl/post/30598218 161 upvotes, 10 comments
- https://feddit.nl/post/30596578 27 upvotes, 0 comment
- https://feddit.nl/post/30602071 13 upvotes, 0 comment
This is a natural phenomenon. When Lemmy will have a bigger userbase (e.g. 100k monthly active users), we could maybe have parallel communities about specific topics, but at the moment, it seems counterproductive.
Thank you for your comment
The idea of migrating communities when moderation becomes problematic sounds good in theory, but in practice, it rarely works, especially as the network scales up. It’s also cumbersome. People don’t want to uproot and start over repeatedly, and large communities don’t just “move” smoothly. Instead, they tend to fracture, lose engagement, or remain stuck under poor leadership.
People left [email protected] after the power tripping: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/29606682. [email protected] became the most active community
[email protected] is also another example: https://feddit.org/post/7025680/4263481
get that, but this feels like a problem that should be solved at the platform level rather than by consolidating communities. People should be able to subscribe to multiple similar communities across different instances, and the feed algorithm should be able to detect and bundle similar posts across these communities. However, it should not decide which content is “best”. It should simply organize the feed more efficiently without interfering with visibility.
This is not going to happen any time soon for Lemmy, and even though Piefed has feeds, the issue stays the same: if a question about European luggage is listed on 3 different communities, people are not going to copy paste their answers in the 3 communities, leading to discussion splintering
In the end, this is the ongoing dilemma of decentralization: Do we prioritize distribution of power, or do we focus on ease of use? There’s no perfect answer, but we should aim for a balance rather than rushing to consolidate.
I am in favor of having one community, [email protected] , due to the good track record of the instance admins.
Should the mods start power tripping, people can organize on [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/30601987
Just here to shed some light on Bookwyrm.social, the Fediverse equivalent of Goodreads. I've been doing some more reading lately, and I like to keep track of what I read and also I like reading other's review, suggestions, etc. Now I boycot amazon and others big tech as much as possible, so for me Bookwyrm.social is the place to be. It's steadily growing I think, but I thought it deserved some more attention, therefor this post. Same goes for BookBrainz and to a lesser extend IA's Openlibrary. OpenLibrary is, among other things, a place where people catalogue book-metadata, and if a book is not on Bookwyrm.social yet, it can often be imported from OpenLibrary. Problem with OpenLibrary is that the data is often messy and there are a lot of duplicates. That's where BookBrainz comes in, the book-equivalent of MusicBrainz. They're not that big yet, but what they do very well is that they have got very clean data. I feel like BookBrainz has the potential to be the perfect source of data on books, for other apps to use as they please, similar to how MusicBrainz is already functioning. It just needs more contributors, but I'm sure it's steadily growing. I just started doing my part, adding the books I read on all three.
Would love to hear thoughts on these platforms, as well as other platform suggestion if you've got any.
Looks great indeed!