BrundleFly2077

I’m sorry, are you responding to me? The dude said “true Christians”. Are you saying there are or there aren’t? Haha 🤦🏻‍♂️ What is happening here?

Edit:

For some reason, only part of your comment was displayed on my side.

Still, get right off my back with this strawman bullshit. I didn’t say any of the shit you’re putting in my mouth. I called out the use of the term “true Christianity” in that guy’s comment.

All that nonsense you’re arguing against came with you to this place.

No true scotch egg or some shit

Iä! Iä!

Clpawd?

Her facial expression is definitely done explaining why we can’t have McDonalds for breakfast for the fiftieth time.

Woah. A Jack Stauber meme.

I’ve never disputed that. I don’t know how reiterating that fact in any way supports the idea that it “forces” transgender individuals to use the same language to describe “all cishet” people.

That was my point. It always has been.

If I were visually impaired and protesting unsuccessfully for better accessibility in my work environments, I can’t imagine why I would make a claim in any capacity including the language “all sighted people”.

I realize that I’m outnumbered here and that this is apparently an unpopular opinion, but nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

You’ve both been quite rude to me and I’m done engaging you, but that’s the full extent of my point and I’m unconvinced by your rebuttals.

Ciao now 🫡

This might be greatest thing I’ve ever seen.

https://codeshare.io/VNl6x3

Try that.