Darkassassin07

joined 2 years ago
[–] Darkassassin07 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Without authentication; it's possible to randomly generate UUIDs and use them to retrieve media from a jellyfin server. That's about the only actually concerning issue on that list, and it's incredibly minor IMO.

With authentication, users (ie, the people you have trusted to access your server) can potentially attack each other, by changing each others settings and viewing each other's watch history/favorites/etc.

That's it. These issues aren't even worth talking about for 99.9% of jellyfin users.

Should they be fixed? Sure, eventually. But these issues aren't cause to yell about how insecure jellyfin is in every single conversation, and to go trying to scare everyone off of hosting it publicly. Stop spreading FUD.

[–] Darkassassin07 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I refuse to browse/watch shorts directly; probably because I know I'll get sucked in to it for several hours, but I also know there's very little useful/valuable info there. I will however occasionally watch other typically gaming YouTubers, reacting to collections of shorts.

[–] Darkassassin07 16 points 1 month ago

This capital battery is not yet used up; it may not be ejected.

[–] Darkassassin07 13 points 1 month ago

At least you know he likes you...

[–] Darkassassin07 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I agree.

We're the ones that destroyed their homes/private spaces to claim them as our own 'public spaces'. (keeping in mind they can't exactly build fully enclosed private spaces like we can, at least not all species)

In many places, You would also still be violating privacy laws if you used/required binoculars or other vision enhancing devices in order to observe people having sex.

For example: using a mirror to see over a tall fence and watch your neighbours fuck in their backyard, Or watching through a distant apartment window with binoculars.

[–] Darkassassin07 19 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The majority of protests involve taking over space temporarily; that alone doesn't make them not peaceful.

They weren't invading/forcing their way into spaces that they weren't already openly invited to be in, nor were they violent towards officials that were demanding they leave (self-defense aside).

[–] Darkassassin07 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Did those birds consent to you watching?

You're welcome to have kinks, but there are courtesies/standards/best practices to obey at the very least.

[–] Darkassassin07 130 points 1 month ago (50 children)

If peaceful protest is going to be consistently met with violent police response; maybe they should stop being peaceful from the outset.

[–] Darkassassin07 112 points 1 month ago (12 children)

"If you're going to start a meeting with fat shaming me, then yes; I am going to fire back. Don't dish it out if you can't take it yourself.

If you have a problem with that, we can get the lawyers involved and discuss it further."

But I also live somewhere that actually has labour laws and where 'at-will' employment is a ridiculous concept. If you want to fire someone (after their three months probation), you've gotta have a good reason and you better document it throughly.

[–] Darkassassin07 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not far off

[–] Darkassassin07 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Walk up to the first employee you can find and ask them if there's an arcade around here and where you can find it.

[–] Darkassassin07 13 points 1 month ago

This is why the only lock on my front door is a deadbolt. If you're not holding the key, you can't lock the door as you leave.

view more: ‹ prev next ›