Daryl

joined 2 months ago
[–] Daryl 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Hydrogen might be interesting, and it may work in some instances/industries but it is very unlikely to work in others.

Makes absolutely no sense. It is like saying 'Milk will work in some recopies [that call for it] but it is unlikely to work in others [that do not use milk]." So let's stop all milk production.

You must be posting for an American audience. Americans fall for that Republi-logic.

[–] Daryl 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

For those unfamiliar with the chemistry, ammonia is just hydrogen and nitrogen, no carbon or oxygen at all.

The trick to transporting hydrogen is to transport it as ammonia.

"Northwestern University researchers have developed a highly effective, environmentally friendly method for converting ammonia into hydrogen. Outlined in a recent publication in the journal Joule, the new technique is a major step forward for enabling a zero-pollution, hydrogen-fueled economy.

"The idea of using ammonia as a carrier for hydrogen delivery has gained traction in recent years because ammonia is much easier to liquify than hydrogen and is therefore much easier to store and transport. Northwestern’s technological breakthrough overcomes several existing barriers to the production of clean hydrogen from ammonia."

https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2020/11/ammonia-to-green-hydrogen/

[–] Daryl 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You obviously did not read that part about Germany, Korea, Japan taking al the hydrogen we can produce.

We pump far more oil and natural gas out of the ground than Canada will EVER use in domestic consumption. Whatever do we do with all the excess?

[–] Daryl 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hah, you're right.Let's just keep destgroying our climate and environment by doing things the way we always have.

Let other nations develop the technology and become strong, while we just become weaker and weaker.

Hey, maybe that is really hat you want?

[–] Daryl 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Hydrogen is not just a fuel, it is important in many chemical and manufacturing processes.

Methinks your cynicism comes from a lack of knowledge.

Or a deliberate attempt to discourage Canada from developing our hydrogen infrastructure long enough for the US to attempt to sweep it out from under us.

But that is my cynicism.

[–] Daryl 1 points 16 hours ago

I read the article. Did you? A bad credit rating did not take the account to zero. Poor credit history did not take the account to zero. Bad debt did not take the account to zero. An accounting mistake, or inaccurate credit information did not take the account to zero. Not paying bills on time did not take the account to zero. Defaulting on a loan or credit card did not take the account to zero. A court judgement did not take the credit rating to zero.

The fact that there was NO credit transactions at all, good OR bad, in two years meant the account was deemed 'unscoreable' - not good, not bad, not horrible, but non-existent. Absolutely no reportable data to form a credit rating on, for two years.

[–] Daryl 3 points 16 hours ago

See also

https://esgreview.net/2024/08/07/new-naturally-occurring-hydrogen-discovery-in-saskatchewan/

for the status of a mega-project in Saskatchewan.

"Southern Saskatchewan is entirely covered by the pervasive and thick Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), which directly overlies the crystalline Pre-Cambrian basement. The basement is the perceived source for naturally occurring hydrogen, especially where the basement rock has an ultramafic composition. There are a series of deep structures, including faults, allowing movement of gasses from the basement upwards into the WCSB. In addition to structures, a series of domes and arches add to the structural complexity of the WCSB. Natural Hydrogen migrates upward into certain geological formations where it can accumulate."

 

We can go two ways. Either we squander the lead, or we grow it.

Fortunately, very little in this strategy depends on American investment or American technology. For instance

"Shell’s Scotford Upgrader captured 77% of its carbon emissions in 2022 ..."

"ArcelorMittal Dofasco in Ontario plans to end the use of coal in its plants,..."

"inclusion of hydrogen in the Canada-EU High-Level Energy Dialogue, active since 2007, where Canada and the EU collaborate on mutual goals ..."

"the Canada-Japan Energy Policy Dialogue, active since 2019, which signed an updated Action Plan for 2023 to 2025 ..."

"the May 2023 Memorandum of Understanding with South Korea on cooperation in critical mineral supply chains, the clean energy tran..."

"the August 2022 Joint Declaration of Intent to establish a Canada-Germany Hydrogen Alliance, which seeks to create ...

"the 2021 Memorandum of Understanding between Canada and the Netherlands on cooperation in the field of hydrogen energy, w..."

"In the East, Atlantic Canada’s abundant and untapped wind resources and immediate proximity to Atlantic shipping routes will allow wind-to-hydrogen electrolysis projects to become reliable suppliers of clean hydrogen to Germany and other European markets. Germany has announced its intention to import up to 50-70 percent of its hydroge..."

Are all points that reflect a Canadian strategy to globalize our hydrogen policies.

Incidentally, recent developments and explorations on naturally-occurring free (unbound to other elements) hydrogen deposits, once thought impossible, now indicate that Canada's unique geology of natural rock formations could make it one of the world's largest sources of naturally-occurring free hydrogen. Enough to power the world for hundreds of years.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/bakx-white-hydrogen-natural-mali-1.7094645

And Newfoundland-Labrador, with its abundance of renewable electrical generation, could make it a world center for hydrogen from electrolysis (it is now one of the leading world centers for current projects).

Let's not drop the ball on this one,, or let the Americans take it away from us like they did the Avro.

[–] Daryl 1 points 17 hours ago

There are time limits built in to the algorithm for calculating your score, that are there because of the agencies themselves and by legislation. Even the negative effects of a bankruptcy completely clear after a given amount of time. One suspects, in fact, if this person DID have negative factors affecting their credit, it would not have been reset to zero. There would have been a timer clicking away to keep feeding the account algorithm with fresh data.

[–] Daryl 2 points 17 hours ago

Scary, reading some of the posts herein, how some people (many?) have absolutely no idea how credit reporting agencies or your credit score actually work. The term 'clueless' comes to mind.

[–] Daryl 3 points 17 hours ago

Your response to my post makes absolutely no sense, unless you are a chatbot. My post has nothing to do with credit or a credit report, it has to do with a glitch in the coding of Lemmy itself. Two identical posts - posted at the same time by the same person using exactly the same URL and heading.

[–] Daryl 0 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It never goes to zero because of bad debt. Even bankruptcy will never take it to zero. There is something very remiss about the 'facts' that you are trying to convince us are true.

[–] Daryl 1 points 20 hours ago

Their entire culture pervades each one, individually. They are definitely NOT like 'everyone else'. The indoctrination into the 'American way' is so pervasive, it is almost impossible to speak to any American individually for any length of time before some aspect of the 'American way' comes through. Basically, the 'American Way' is summed up by the phrase 'The entire world is centered around America, and only America maters'.

 

In other words, some Republican senators still want to insert the knife into Caanda, to drain our lifeblood, but they want it done compassionately.

 

Take that, America.

Never underestimate the strength of Canadian resolve in the face of enemy action.

 

The irony is, the only country that has EVER, in Canada's entire history as a nation, shown any intent or interest. either by word or deed, into attacking Canada is ... the United States of America.

No other country has even hinted, ever, that it wants to or will or is planning to attack Canada the Nation.

England and France had a tiff over who would control the land that would be called Canada, and both ended up having a partnership in the new Nation of Canada. After that, they showed no interest. Well, maybe a comment or two from Chuck DeGaul.

Not even in either of the two World Wars.

In fact, it was not until the mid 1940's that America proposed that Canada and the United States should be friends and partners in the military sense. Before that, we always had a healthy fear of the military intentions of America towards us.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogdensburg_Agreement

And here a slightly different bias

https://tbaw.ca/2024/05/08/the-ogdensburg-agreement-part-i-introduction/

 

Could THIS is the beginning of Canada finally standing o its own two feet in national Defense, after the Avro disaster? A home-grown defense industry using home-grown technology?

The public sentiment is ripe for this initiative to NOT be suppressed by American narcissism.

 

Dontcha just love it when Trump tries to tell CANADIANS what we want and don't want?

 

Rather than collapsing, the Canadian economy seems to be holding up quite well to the American fascist aggression.

Canada survives and prospers, America falters and their decline continues.

 

Another news article I am not sure what to make of. There are just so many levels of complexity to this.

Since the carbon tax comes off one time only, for a one time price reduction. and thus only offset price increases this time only, will we see inflation resuming its normal limb next report?

And will we see price reductions in the supermarket to reflect this? Or was in mainly gasoline for transportation and heating that led the offset?

 

Housing crisis? There ain't no stinkn' housing crisis.

There is, however, an 'overabundance of stupid' crisis.

 

Any excuse for Loblaws to raise their prices even higher than they have been.

 

Can anyone make sense of this article? Seems absolutely full of contradictions.

Trump threatens to increase imports of pharmaceuticals into America. Trump threatens increased tariffs on pharmaceuticals. Somehow, American pharmaceutical companies will export drugs cheaply to Canada and then import them back to America and sell them cheaper than they can sell the drugs kept back in America. The world is seemingly dependent on American pharmaceutical firms. India makes most of the world's generic drugs. Canadian drug plans are, by and large, really pushing for the substitution of generics for brand names for reimbursement purposes. Drugs are a lot cheaper in Canada. Somehow, Canada is supposed to import the drugs made in India through American channels, paying American tariffs, instead of directly from India. So Americans can buy them back cheaper than Canadians pay. The ''free enterprise' system, as exemplified by the American drug producers, will always result in the lower price. No American government, Republican or Democrat, has been remotely successful in bringing down American drug costs. There are too many rich people who can afford to pay absurdly high costs for drugs. The top 10% of American income earners is still equal to the entire population of Canada. That is a LOT of demand for drugs-at-any-cost. The Republican "Keep government out of private enterprise" party wants the American federal government to be more like our Canadian government in being able to regulate pharmaceutical profits and drug costs. Instead of wanting Canada to join America, several States want to join Canada when it comes to securing lower drug costs. Trump wants Canadians to pay more for drugs so Americans can get them cheaper. Somehow, wait for it, according to Trump's non-logic America is subsidizing the costs of drugs in the rest of the world, and 'The National Security of America' is at risk.

 

Have you noticed how many AMERICAN owed corporations are now claiming Canadian connections?

McDonalds is claiming Canadian ownership, because their franchises are owned by Canadians.

Lazyboy, which has no manufacturing or assembly n Canada, is claiming a 'buy Canadian' slant because the Lazyboy stores in Ontario are licensed to Canadian owners.

Even saw an add where ESSO is claiming Canadian roots, for over half a century.

Next, Walmart will be touting that it has Canadian roots.

view more: next ›