DebatableRaccoon

joined 2 years ago
[–] DebatableRaccoon 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's foolish to reinforce such behaviour.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] DebatableRaccoon 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ironically, that would be treason.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 7 points 2 weeks ago

What a surprise... 🙄 The only way Nintendo has worked hard to 'mitigate the issue' and still hasn't landed on Hall Effect as the answer is if they're purposefully keeping shit components but want them to be just good enough for them to not get sued.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Which means games are pushing themselves out of the market despite looking to make more money.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 7 points 2 weeks ago

Though that's a good example of a legalised scam too.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Can someone just put a bullet in him already. Please

[–] DebatableRaccoon 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] DebatableRaccoon 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shark is an American brand

I don't get this. Are we boycotting American products now?

[–] DebatableRaccoon 2 points 2 weeks ago

They're definitely in an ivory tower at the least.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

As great a philosophical mainstay as Hanlon's razor is, I find it pretty difficult to believe a system of laws that almost exclusively favour the wealthy, especially when it's people in positions of wealth that write said laws, is some happy accident.

[–] DebatableRaccoon 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

You think the string-pullers would be honest about their goals? It's all about control, making sure the haves keep.

view more: ‹ prev next ›