DrYes

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they probably have an understanding of physics we don't currently know about in the wider public.

I don't believe any secret agencies have a better understanding of fundamental physics. They have better technology and engineering.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

bro. nice avatar :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Guys, do we really need clickbait headlines from poor sources like politico?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"They started hitting me first. So I hit back"

You:

First of all, I understand you think it’s okay to do, because you think it’s already being done by aggressors. But regardless of who started it, by saying it’s okay for self-defenders to do this you are also saying it’s okay for anyone else to do this. Because, if it’s a good thing to do, then it must be a good thing to do by someone you don’t like.

Your argument has no merit if this were an actual self-defense situation. Which Trump's followers believe it is. So you'd need to argue that it isn't a self-defense situation. Your argument wins no one over who needs to be won over.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

This looks like a 15 year old game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNP4Sx3PtQI

This is a BF3 video from 12 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FktL2pu2wE

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I read the article and the lawsuit has nothing to do with my question. It's more about precedent and actually finding out what the laws are if everything is as claimed.

Still think detectability is an interesting question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I didn't read the article but does it say anything about detectability? If I claim I created it who can prove an AI did?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I'm sure OP is talking about the 1984 movie Repo Man

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087995/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Not the OP. I can easily imagine a test that, if someone cannot pass it, I can clearly say they shouldn't be representatives. While still weeding out cases like Feinstein.

Might there be problems with people who have the knowledge but have problems with the process of being tested? Maybe. But maybe those people also shouldn't be representatives. I don't know enough about the causes of test fright to be confident on that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

YSalsoK that many sites block these email addresses when trying to sign up. especially the bigger providers of such services.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

i hear the people who created meth made a new drug. might try it for fun/curiosity...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjEaoINr3zgFX8ZsChQVQsuDSjEqdWMAD

I believe this is the latest version but it might already be outdated. Blender changes stuff around often so these get outdated pretty quickly. I did the version before that (came out 3 years ago).

edit: if stuff isn't there or not working like it's shown you can search "how to do [x] in [current Blender version]"

view more: ‹ prev next ›