Dreamer

That is. . . disgusting.

Thanks for sharing the information.

What the fuck?

I don't care if this practice ended more than a decade ago; the fact that the Israelis would even do this at all is just disgusting and repulsive.

Bruh

“The Israeli army said it bombed the house because there was a Hamas officer in there, which is totally false. I know the whole family. It’s nonsense. It’s just so devastating.”

So, this wasn't even a random bombing. It was 100^100% deliberate precise targeting.

It's not even shocking anymore.

I'm always happy to help educate a fellow goy!

What is Zionism?

In short, Zionism is just Nazism but replace Aryan with Jew.

The more fleshed out answer is that Zionism is an ideology with its basis being Jewish racial supremacy. Just like with Nazi ideology and the Aryans, Zionist ideology believes in both the right and the entitlement to an ethnostate of a "special" or "chosen" people no matter the means, even if it comes at the deprivation of rights and injustice of other people.

Why is this problematic?

The problem is two-fold and can be found by observing history. During the founding of the current iteration of the Zionist project, known as Israel, the Jewish racial supremacists would rape, murder, and rob the indigenous people initially living on the land where the supremacists wanted to establish their ethnostate. Currently, Zionists will glorify, support, and perpetuate these actions to keep the ethnostate alive.

Why do Zionists glorify, support, or partake in rape, murder, and thievery?

First, Zionists believe racial Jews have the literal right commit such heinous actions against others, as Zionism holds racial Jews to be superior to others or as "God's chosen people". Second, even if these actions are deemed evil, Zionism justifies them as "necessary" evils, as they ensure the establishment and perpetuation of the Jewish ethnostate--something Zionism holds above all else.

Summary

A person who is a Zionist is a person who believes that racial Jews have the right to rape, murder, and rob others, whether due to their perceived privilege or to ensure the establishment and perpetuation of their ethnostate.

I hope this answers your question!

The comments from the enlightened athiests are killing me, lmao.

OP, from my understanding of Jewish religion, whether your dogma permisses the consumption of biscuits or not can be found by observing your stance on Zionism.

If you're Zionist, you're already rebelling against Yahweh's decree of Three Oath's by either outright denial or by thinking you can outsmart Yahweh through some perceived technicality or loophole. If that's the case, by all means, eat all the biscuits you desire; you'll eventually find someway to convince yourself that you didn't actually violate the decrees during Passover anyways.

Now, if you're not a Zionist, then you are actually following Yahweh and give proper respect and credence into the very spirit of Yahweh's decrees. In that case, no, do not eat any biscuits. Just like Lent and Ramadan, Passover will eventually. . . pass over, and you will live to eat your beloved biscuits another day.

You know, all this targeting of children and infants reminds me of the Pharoah's slaughter of the Jewish infants in ancient Egypt. . . What was the reason again?

Your kind likes to forget which people were in power when gaza was turned into "a parking lot". Who was it that set the stage for Trump and enabled his rhetoric of "rebuilding" Gaza? Which people were in power when billions were being sent to the rapists, murderers, and thieves, when they were being granted diplomatic cover, unconditional support, and immunity? Who was it that legitimized their attacks on civilians, noncombatants, journalists, healthcare workers?

Support for the rapists, murderers, and thieves and their wretched state has been historically unanimously bipartisan for decades, and any perceived rifts are nothing short of optics to placate the average "bleeding heart" liberal.

Time and time again, your kind would rather acquiesce and work against your own interests and the interests of those you claim to care for than take meaningful action if the latter were to even pose an ounce of risk. And where has this led us?

Now you get to suffer with us. Enjoy :)

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten, habe ich geschwiegen; ich war ja kein Kommunist.

Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten, habe ich geschwiegen; ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.

Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten, habe ich geschwiegen; ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.

Als sie die Juden einsperrten, habe ich geschwiegen; ich war ja kein Jude.

Als sie mich holten, gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.

Reading these accounts, their details, how can we not feel hatred and disgust towards those responsible?

When I responded to the commenter before you, I was thinking more in the general sense with scientific constructivism and the Bohrian interpretation of observation, measurement, and reality in mind.

However, what you said reminds me of the more institutionalized issues plaguing the sciences, and my mind went to the textbook case of The Bell Curve.

Science is a construct made by humans in their effort to best understand the world they exist in. The consciousness of science is not nothing, but the collective conciousness of every human being that has participated, and along with it, their collective follies and limitations.