EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Atheist.

As far as I see, there are 2 basic possible states for being(s) with regards to divinity: either they're omnipotent or they're not omnipotent. (Partial omnipotence may perhaps be great power, but it is still non-omnipotence by definition.)

The Stone Paradox demonstrates that full omnipotence cannot happen; and any being, however powerful, that does not have full omnipotence is inherently no different than me or you and thus has no right to be considered a god.


and if you switched faiths, why did you do it and what faith did you choose?

Well, I used to be a Christian, but only by virtue of being raised as one. As I grew older, I grew out of Christianity. It makes no sense to me from the perspective of the scientific method or Occam's Razor. Also, my very traditional Christian family did not exactly live up to the Christ-like ideals of love and tolerance, so that definitely put me off it, I can tell you that much.

As I got older, I tried other religions: Islam, Zen Buddhism, Earth paganism, various other forms of paganism. They were excellent experiences that taught me the value of different faiths but they were, in the end, not for me. I like the rock that the scientific method provides, and I like how it teaches and encourages critical thinking ability. With science, I don't need to take some reverend's word for it that a magical sky-daddy is watching me masturbate while my great-great-grandmother judges me from past the celestial gates. I can be confident to know that it's far more likely they're dead in the ground, disintegrating back into the earth from whence they came.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Lol, that is funny. xD

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks so much for the suggestions!

Unfortunately, as much as I'd love to try out Yorkshire Tea (I've heard they're amazing), they don't ship internationally, so as I live in the USA, I don't think that's an option for me. :C

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

To be fair, although admittedly a nitpick, I will say I never said that the caffeine dehydrated you, just that the teas and tisanes do, the latter of which may or may not have caffeine.

That being said, I looked it up and yeah you're right. The evidence does seem to demonstrate that the diuretic effect of the caffeine in teas not substantial enough to really affect hydration levels.

However, it does lead me to wonder why my body seems to dehydrate if I drink more 2 cups of tea in a day. Like, it doesn't cause me to pee more (at least not more than an equivalent amount of straight water would cause me to pee); my body just dries out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

As an American who wasn't ever raised on tea of any kind (and I don't like coffee) but is starting to really learn to love teas and tasanes (I'm open to suggestions, by the way!), I have to ask: how the hell do you manage to drink 8–10 cups per day without dying of dehydration? If I drink more than 3 cups a day I start to really feel dried out!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I have not once in my entire life heard anyone say it like that. Where are you from? Maybe it's a regional thing...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

sen-tar

"sen-" like "cent" (like 25 cents), and "-tar" like "a tar pit"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Oh my goodness, girl, those eyes!

They are mesmerizingly gorgeous! ^_^

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You're not wrong.

Threat model. It's all about the threat model.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Lol this is great. Totally sending this to my spousy. :3

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I think I'll try using that hotkey (or something similar)!

Thanks for the suggestion. ;D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

......Okay, I'm gonna be honest. I don't know how to respond to this.

 
  • In the Megathread, section 3-12 (Unsafe Sites), under "All Purpose", the first entry is 1377x-to, reason listed as

    Fake clone: (Crafted with cunning intent to ensnare unsuspecting users through deliberate deception).

  • However, in the Megathread, section 3-1 (All Purpose), under "Torrents", likewise the first entry is 1377x-to.

 


Edit:

Lol, got the characters mixed up, I guess. Whoops. Well, to all the people being nice about it and kindly letting me know, thank you very much!

To all the people being dicks about it (concerningly a lot of you it seems ಠ_ಠ), maybe learn a bit of humility. Some people mix up similar-looking characters in their heads. It's a thing that happens.

231
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

I'm well aware that I can rip most Blu-rays with MakeMKV and then convert to mp4 with Handbrake; however, the former just rips everything raw from the disk so the file size is humongous and the conversion via Handbrake for just a single file is terribly long and puts a lot of strain on my computer.

I've heard that EaseFab LosslessCopy is decent, but they only have a Windows and a Mac version, and I'm unsure how well it'd run under Wine.

I am willing to pay for it, but only as long as it's not a subscription thing. Has to be a one-time payment.

Does anyone know any decent Blu-ray ripping software that fits these conditions and run well on Linux? Specifically, it would be either Pop!_OS or Linux Mint. (I'm still using Windows because I want to figure out some software alternatives before I do so I'm not caught with my pants down, so to speak.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›