Season 2 does get better. Episode 1 is mostly for recap purposes. The low budget for season 2 does really show during one of the arcs but if you can ignore it, then the story is great. Season 2 isn't like season 1, where there's one overarching antagonist. Instead, Iwanaga goes around solving different cases over a few multi-episode arcs. The format is basically the same though, and there's still lots of talking.
Ghostc1212
joined 2 years ago
"Then who's vice-president, Jerry Lewis?"
For the record, I'd be down to eat both cats and dogs if given the opportunity, I just wouldn't eat my own pets.
How do these people function in their daily lives? Do they have service dogs or something who bark every time someone makes a joke?
People who didn't like the first season's pacing probably have had their attention spans whittled down to nothing. I loved the first season. Iwanaga is such a great protagonist and I loved the themes explored in her battles against the main antagonist and in her attempts to solve the other cases.
In/Spectre Season 2's OP, Yotogibanashi, doesn't get nearly enough attention, much like the show itself.
The USA is a union of states. The House of Representatives is where the people are represented proportionally. The reason why we have the Senate is so that the smaller states don't get fucked over by the more populous ones, because again, the states are legally equal under the union. I do think FPTP and the electoral college are stupid though.
i am going to declare the Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition Act of 2018 to be unconstitutional
so what happens when republicans take back the Senate and the presidency and then add like 10 conservative justices to balance out the liberal ones
I have always believed in taking bits and stuff from everyone and leaving the negative that doesn't benefit me as a person bc I too have to adapt in society.
And I find that while some of what Andrew Tate says has positive effects on society, most of what he says is negative and that it outweighs the positives, and his target demographic, teenage boys, are biologically incapable of comprehending nuance due to their undeveloped brains, and are therefore way too stupid to be trusted to only take the good and leave the bad. Therefore, Andrew Tate and people like him should be ostracized by society.
Men ought to have higher aspirations than owning a Bugatti and fucking a lot of hoes. Andrew Tate does not promote any such aspirations. A society where young men only care about sex and supercars is a society on the fast track to collapse.
Modern society cares more about fighting perceived evil than they do about being good, or honorable. Even the truth must not stand in the way of the wrath of the angry mob of keyboard warriors.