GoodEye8

And you're proving my point about this being a waste of time. But that's fine. It's fine if you get so riled up that you need to call me a liar and insecure and claiming I want to derail whatever soapbox you're on. I don't care because at the end of the day I'm not the one telling minimum wage workers, who can't afford to save money, that all they need to do is just save more money. Unlike you I know what being poor means, which is why I know what you're saying is compete garbage. But hey, don't let me stop you from letting everyone know what you are.

And I'm going to say more people wanted official ultrawide support. Now what? Are we supposed to poll every time someone wants to do something? If I feel like important for me to jaywalk and I step in front of a car and the driver feels it's more important for them to not stop what then? Are we supposed to block traffic to until we figure out whose action is more important so they'd have right of way?

This is why we have laws, because everything does not need to be looked at case by case and sometimes we can collectively agree that one way is always better than the other way.

Right. So whoever did the update at Bethesda found it important to do that update. The developers of FO:London found it important to release their mod. If you ask the Bethesda employee they'd think their work was more important. If you ask the FO:L team they would say their work was more important. How do you determine whose importance was more important?

If possible don't buy a car. Cars, even electric ones, have a huge environmental cost. It's not always possible but we should be using public transportation and bicycles way more than we use cars.

It's not an all or nothing thing, getting rid of consumerism would definitely be a net positive for society. But your suggestion goes squarely in the same hole as "to solve climate change people need to watch their carbon footprint" while completely ignoring the fact that the biggest polluters are corporations. Or the "to solve microplastics people need to sort their trash" which again completely ignores the fact that a very small part of plastics are recyclable because most corporations won't spend extra money to make more recyclable plastics (or ideally not use plastics at all).

What you're suggesting is a net positive in the context of the problem but its not going to solve the problem. Just like with climate change and microplastics your "solution" is just kicking the can down the road instead of actually solving the problem.

I ended up reading your other comments. You're out of touch with reality and there's nothing I could say that others haven't already brought up, and since you're not listening to them I doubt you'll listen to me. So the only thing I can add is that you should start practicing what you're preaching and get off the internet because the internet is a luxury. Then again I imagine you won't have a problem justifying your own "wasting money on bullshit" because you can afford it.

Wealthiest nation in the world (by a large margin if I may add), regular people are struggling to get by and your solution is "just be more frugal"? I'd imagine if you're the wealthiest nation in the world you can afford some luxuries but I guess not according to you. Also, if you're so wealthy where does all that wealth go?

That's exactly my point. It was his job to know and he barely knew anything. If there was someone trying to verify the existence of magic Ron's dad wouldn't be able to do anything about it because he wouldn't even understand what that person is doing.

I think you can play PvE Tarkov because the raids run on your machine (except for Streets). But if you're already willing play PvE you might as well play SPtarkov which does work on Linux and has a modding scene that offers a significantly better PvE experience.

EDIT: just a PSA that Tarkov uses Battleye, which supports Proton. Just like with almost every other game the only reason you can't play Tarkov on Linux is because the developer doesn't want to you to do that.

I'm fine with that. I'm not saying we should be able to "aquire" magic. I'm saying we're somehow incapable of even acknowledging its existence. If muggles can't perceive magic then what's the point of keeping it a secret.

Obviously that's not true because not only could Dursleys see magic but it was used on them, thus magic is observable and muggles would be trying to harness it because they wouldn't know they can't.

So it also somewhat makes sense why they'd have a secret society. But to keep it a secret you need know what the muggles are up to so they wouldn't discover your secret. You need something like an intelligence agency to keep track of muggles and intervene if they get close to the secret.

But you don't know how the muggle world works, so you don't know what the muggles are doing which means you can't intervene if they start to discover magic. If you can't prevent them from discovering magic why haven't they discovered magic?

While I think that can be explained away with the idea that the magic is so OP they don't actually need to know science. To use the Rowlings own tidbit as an example, why bother with toilets when you can simply magic away your shit.

And that also leads to what IMO is the biggest plot point nobody really thinks about. That there's a secret society of magic users who almost exclusively use magic, and the "muggle" society has no idea of its existence.

Think about all the things we've discovered. Electromagnetism is pretty much magic, we figured that out. Atoms are pretty much magic, not only did we figure out atoms we figured out what atoms consist of. Einstein predicted black holes, something so out there that even Einstein doubted his prediction, we later discovered and modeled it. We can literally come up with absolutely insane ideas and then come up with ways to prove or disprove those ideas. There's no chance we wouldn't figure out the existence of magic and a secret society if we saw glimpses of something that makes us go "hmm, that's interesting".

You could argue that they use magic to hide magic from us, but they'd have to know about what we are doing to make sure we don't accidentally stumble into discovering magic. But Arthur Weasley makes it pretty clear wizards don't understand how our world works. They don't know what we're doing so their secret society is literally at the mercy of us not just noticing it.

So the secret of society pretty much exists on the premise that we're too stupid to figure out Magic, but smart enough to create the society we have.

It's not. It's the fault of their parents who have chosen to not integrate into society and create self-imposed ghettos. There's no segregation, they could've put their children into Estonian kindergarten or school. And most of the Russians actually do put their children into Estonian kindergartens or schools, because they want their children to learn Estonian because they get better education and better career options. There's a minority of a minority who refuses to integrate and their children are now the victims of something they could easily prevented if they just bothered to do it.