HK65

A lot of the money can and should be spent on dual-use stuff.

For example, the biggest hurdle that prevents the deployment of the armies of Europe to the Eastern flank is the state of the railway network.

Yeah, the problem was mostly that the two parties so far were "full throttle" and "no throttle", and half of these guys are upset that someone found the brakes, while the other half would like to continue on mostly full throttle without overheating the engine because they want long-lasting fascism instead of breaking down on the side of the highway to hell.

Nah, it seems like it's the party of taking all the bribes. Their problem with current politics is that voters are actually expecting Democrats to do something other than taking bribes while the Republicans are afraid that all the bribes they are taking will be meaningless if Trump becomes God-King.

Actually, this might not even be a bad thing, the corrupt leaving the Dem party on their own would actually free that platform to actually do something for once.

Closer to eleven actually.

Also, 21600 World Trade Center attacks.

Yeah, this is some SS level shit. Or more accurately, Trump wants his own Rosgvardiya.

On the one hand, I don't see the point of raising the defence budget just to hand all that money we are actually taking out as loans over to the US. A major point of the whole shebang should be to drive EU-domestic investment and jobs.

On the other hand, WTF Denmark? Anyone Danish here can explain Danish politics and how this guy is not secretly getting off on being cucked by Trump?

This is ironic since Tesla itself is caught in the spiral around Elon Musk.

It has been tried many times in history since the first tanks. I wonder if modern battery tech makes it more feasible than it was 100 years ago.

There are hybrids, even in WWI there were French tanks with hybrid drivetrains, then WWII Germans also had super-heavy stuff with hybrid engines, and the AbramsX is supposed to also be like that.

The tools that would kill enough humans to matter would hurt the biosphere much worse than it hurts humans. Otters and bees don't have gas masks and nuclear shelters.

No, because after the war we'll need to start rebuilding stuff we just destroyed, so the people remaining will increase their emissions many times. Also, hypernormalisation after a war might just render public opinion towards climate change indifferent.

So imagine if the problem was deforestation and people heating with chopped wood. War means that we'll burn all their wooden houses down, and then see them cut down even more trees to rebuild them.

Also, large wars cause baby booms.

Fuck yeah, let's go! I was sad that it looked like it would die.