IAmVeraGoodAtThis

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I've been both of these to the same person (or at least that's how I read their response).

Turns out, autism is not a monolith. Who knew?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

(1)(3)(5)

Fight me. Also, one of these is a function

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Welp, there's nothing to lose I think. I'm gonna give it a shot and see if it works

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh, by "that space" I meant the space where that specific person hung out in, not AI research in general

Though I have heard a fair share of idiotic takes from actual researchers as well

[–] [email protected] 71 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

I have seen AI apologists talk about how "AI" is already sentient and we shouldn't restrict it because it's immoral.

That straight up killed my desire to interact in ~~that space~~ the community with that person

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

🥰 😳 thank you

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I mean, sure. My comment was entirely tongue in cheek. I didn't like awards, especially those that are more than just a glorified emoji (such as those I mentioned)

But, truth be told, the wealthy can just straight up buy discussions and opinions. User farms/bots aren't free, and neither was Twitter currently X. Nothing can hide from the cruel hand of capital. The fediverse isn't immune to this either: it's too small for anyone rich to buy out, but there's very little preventing them from just buying one of the larger instances. And even without that, it still privileges those with money - hosting isn't free.

The most we can do is to stay vigilant, I suppose. Be aware of the inherent biases in the world and refuse to engage with systems that are too strongly captured - Twitter currently X, the zuck platform, Reddit soon (probably).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Didn't a lot of traditions start this way? First they solved some problem, then they forgot the problem existed and continued to apply the solution

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (5 children)

But it doesn't make your comment glow/move around/whatever the fuck awards did

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Math is a language and as such it's less pure than sociology. The universe knows no numbers, it knows no addition not division.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Which is why you should:

  1. Preallocate the vector if you can guesstimate the size
  2. Use a vector library that won't reallocate the entire vector on every single addition (like Rust, whose Vec doubles in size every time it runs out of space)

Memory is fairly cheap. Allocation time not so much.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is this a reference to Bergson v Einstein?

If it is, why am I aware of it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›