IntriguedIceberg

joined 2 years ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
New category of particles discovered in the subatomic realm in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

A theoretical discovery is still a discovery isn't it?

goldcrests in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

This is the type of meta-content I live for lol

My character Kimberly in Scott pilgrim style in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I really like this! Great job!

loss rule in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

~~:.|:;~~

I just cited myself. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

It still equals 1, you can prove it without using fractions:

x = 0.999...

10x = 9.999...

10x = 9 + 0.999...

10x = 9 + x

9x = 9

x = 1

There's even a Wikipedia page on the subject

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills... in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Saw it for the first time very recently. I did NOT expect such... versatility from racoons' testicles. Great movie for a wild ride

Looking for emotional game recommendations in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Didn't know about the third one. Thanks, I'll check it out!

Looking for emotional game recommendations in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Came here to say the exact same thing: To the Moon is definitely a game for ugly crying. I even replayed it a couple of years ago, and even when I already KNEW what was going to happen, I still found myself crying for hours and being overemotional for a week. Great games with beautiful storytelling. I can feel myself tearing up just by thinking about it. Maybe it's time for another replay haha

Maybe you guys should have thought this through. in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Babyslaughter

the perfect efficiency in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That yak ain't gonna shave itself

23,328 Rules in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious, what's the definition of sex in the context of fungi?

Super Mario 3D World - Chainlink Charge - Koji Kondo in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

What a great tune! Thanks!

65
Can we simulate sound? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9 comments fedilink
 

I know that nowadays there are some physics engines pretty advanced, capable of very complex simulations.

Are we at a point in technology where if, for example, we were to simulate a rock being dropped on the floor from a certain distance, the simulation can calculate the shape and weight of the rock , the air resistance experienced during the fall, the density of the floor where the rock will fall onto, and all the other thousands of factors involved, and from those things "calculate" the sound that the rock will make when hitting the floor, and then reproduce it?

Is there such a thing? Are we there yet? If not, is it something feasible?

view more: next ›