Jason2357

If you don’t think they all talked about those problems, you weren’t listening. The difference was which party’s solution was believable. In my mind none of them were good enough, but Pierre’s ideas were particularly terrible. He would have DOGEd his way to a solution.

NAT punching and proxying when a p2p connection between any 2 nodes cannot be achieved. It’s a world of difference with mobile devices when they always see each other, all the time. However, headscale does all that.

I switched from Tailscale to headscale, and I still would suggest Tailscale to anyone. It’s just really done well and they seem to actually love that self-hosters and hobbyists use their stuff.

Too many people thought that tax would cut into their retirement investments. So dumb. We can’t do anything good without conservative hucksters convincing median income Canadians it will hurt them.

Is there a software distribution of endbox? Id love to build one with an old rpi and monitor.

Well, that’s what you are doing with ssh tunnels and remote browsers. If you want separation, they can put your computer in their router’s DMZ (demilitarized zone), so it doesn’t have access to their devices. Additionally, If you use the Tailscale IPs (or host names) instead of their local IPs on his network, they won’t ever change.

It makes no sense from a thermodynamics point of view, but it makes amazing sense to VC money and government bribes.

That's a very interesting idea. I camped on crown land (hike in) as a teen, but havn't since then. I do both inland camping by canoe, and trailer camping on serviced sites. I hadn't thought of boondocking on crown land - that is just a combination I didn't realize was possible in Ontario (I know it's common out west where you have open land). I guess it makes sense. I think it would definitely take some careful scouting to find places safe and well-graded enough to pull a camper trailer into.

I would do it, but I still think we need more serviced provincial parks because that's what a lot of people are comfortable with, and with our land, why the hell not?

These people never met a public service they don’t want to privatize off to the highest ~~bidder~~ buddy.

Indeed. This isn’t just current conservatism, it’s also the last 40 years of Neoliberalism that considers things like public health to “cost money” rather than save lives. Just another one of those “nice to haves” when the budget allows.

Even in the most extreme scenario, they will be aiming to stabilize prices, so it will take rising wages over at least a decade to make housing affordable. They won’t want to see prices dropping because they will be worried about a financial crash when people start walking away from under-water mortgages.

Edit: not disagreeing with your main point. Cutting off immigration entirely would be suicidal for a country with our demographics.

The threat of missiles hitting Ottawa lets the Russians be more aggressive in arctic waterways. Cold War negotiation.