rather early
Make that straight away. Be someone who can put in some effort for special occasions (like dates) but never give the impression you are anyone you are not.
rather early
Make that straight away. Be someone who can put in some effort for special occasions (like dates) but never give the impression you are anyone you are not.
There's developing, then there's de-veloping
Trump makes it a point to brag about not knowing what "no" means
I know right, while reading it I kept thinking "I can totally see how people might start to believe these models are sentient", it was fascinating, the way it was "thinking"
Largest to smallest is at best ambiguous. It can refer to the size of the number itself, or the size of the unit.
There is a reason this exact concept in maths/computer science is known as the "significance" of the digit. Eg. The "least significant bit" in binary is the last one.
By keeping years in different folders you are just implicitly creating the ISO format: eg. 2025/"04/28.xls"
Largest to smallest is also wrong. In 2025/01/28, the 28 is larger than the 01.
It should be "most significant" to "least significant"
Because "context -> precision" is exactly the reason someone earlier gave as reasoning for the American system?
I've suddenly had a revelation as to why Elon is obsessed with the letter "X"...
One could argue that since we are but merely very complicated, slow burning chemical reactions, that the very concept of "pretend" is pretend.
What about naked-snails?
Just wait until AIs start being AI generated π€