Carney was a big deal back in the day. He might have the name value.
The charisma? No. But then, I don't think the most charismatic person alive could pull the Liberals out of their current spiral in the next 3 months.
Carney was a big deal back in the day. He might have the name value.
The charisma? No. But then, I don't think the most charismatic person alive could pull the Liberals out of their current spiral in the next 3 months.
But, it’s been mostly the AAA studios that produced massive, massive high-budget flops, and then they laid off a bunch of their staff.
Those are still failures on the publisher's part. This isn't 30 years ago. Most game studios are not independent, they're owned by the publishers, and the publishers have immense creative control.
No, but when developers and the rest of the teams see that it’s “live-service schlock”, they should start looking at their resumes, instead of thinking “well, my job is safe because it’s a large corporation”.
Really easy to say, but, believe it or not, during a time where the tech industry is actively shedding 10s of thousands of jobs, looking at your resume doesn't actually do anything for you.
Honestly, you seem to be saying "it's developers fault because I refuse to understand power dynamics". You may as well just scream "bootstraps" over and over.
Sites do not know about remote communities by default. Someone on your local site need to search their whole group address (group@remotehost) to make it known.
The fediverse, despite appearances, is local-first. Lemmy requires legwork to work with remote sites.
Pretty sure it was Idaho
Is this the same guy who was hiring for web devs just a few weeks ago?
Well, you see, the combination of mayonnaise and melted cheese creates a chemical chain reaction in my brain that makes me feel good.
Nah. They just believe it will make stock values increase (or that not doing thr AI thing will cause stock values to decrease).
Remember, a publically traded company produces shareholder value. How they do it doesn't matter.
"Don't disrupt anything with your protest. Be small, and unseen."
"Also, don't interfere with the operation of your boss's business when striking. It's really shitty when they lose revenue, and when I don't get my doodads in a timely manner!"
Well, stop expressing that people shouldn't have to make choices about what they use, and maybe I'd give a shit what you say or do.
They're websites. You're arguing that people shouldn't use different websites. On the Internet. Which is kind of how the Internet's been going the last 15 years, and has turned out to be a total disaster.
The idea that the largest game in town should adopt the features of smaller players, rather than users exploring other options because there's a slight inconvenience to the user just seems, I don't know, incredibly entitled. It's also how smaller projects stay invisible and die, leading to a monoculture.
So no, you're not arguing that "we should have a monoculture!", you're just saying "people shouldn't have to make choices!" which... leads to monoculture. And overwhelmingly supports the status quo.
they would have to do the whole “which instance to join” dance, again.
Oh, this again.
Seriously, you're now arguing for a monoculture and centralization.
At that point, just go back to Reddit.
It's fascinating rhetoric if he is talking about the trade deficit. It really speaks to his habitual refusal to pay for products and services rendered.
He thinks paying for shit is for suckers.