Kiernian

What's the thing Elon does where he keeps his head lower, but looks up at the most extreme angle-of-eyeballs he can?

AND it doesn't matter WHAT the other airport let you do because what they let you do has everything to do with THEIR policies and scanner capabilities and whatever CURRENT airport you're in follows a policy written with the equipment THEY have in mind.

Airport A lets you keep your laptop in the bag because their scanner is powerful enough to see through circuitboards and batteries to tell whether there's C4 or whatever wedged in there or not, airport B has a "laptops out of bags and power it on for me please" because the scanner in airport B can't see through all the semi-precious metals in the circuitboards and battery plates, but they're pretty sure you can't wedge enough C4 or whatever in there between the scan-blocking parts to do anything and still be able to turn the thing on.

But airport B does know what airport A does or has and it doesn't matter because they don't have it.

It's shitty and we should have standardized if we were going to do it all, but I'm betting some actuary somewhere has actual statistics on the semi-effectiveness of having differing policies and the confusion that sows.

On paper it's probably theoretically harder plan around a system you don't know, or something.

Wait, what?

Like, at the time? Or still?

I respectfully disagree on the TSA, anecdotally.

I know a few people who applied there simply because it WAS a job in their area that paid more than minimum wage and, at least until recently, by virtue of being a government job, it was more likely to actually care about federal protections for employees with disabilities than, say, retail work, which only gives the minimum required number of fucks, and only then when someone is watching or has a lawyer handy.

Also, a significantly larger amount of the population has unfortunately accepted the questionable stipulations of the patriot act than have decided due process is simply too much work, so I feel that's a distance of an order or three of legal magnitude, comparison-wise.

I'm not saying everyone who works for the TSA is there due to lack of other options, but given it's ubiquity and level of employee turnover in airport towns, at least SOME them are.

In theory that means they have newer scanners.

I say in theory because for sanity's sake I hope that's the case, but I also know how they've historically worked thanks to the likes of Bruce Schneier.

This is based on the TYPE of scanner each checkpoint has and that frequently differs from airport to airport.

The problem is, most of THEM don't even know that, so yeah, you appear mind-bogglingly stupid to them and they look needlessly arcane and possibly deliberately cruel and rude to you.

Alambre

New kinds of water, you say? The marketing department is already on it and boy have I got news for you!

I personally feel like anyone who's not a bigot IS by nature a feminist at least in a solidarity for the ENTIRE human race sense, but keep in mind, this is coming from my perspective as a male, so I might be missing something by virtue of it not regularly impacting me personally.

I'd love a less-abused word, personally.

As a guy, I don't think I'd WANT to call myself a feminist, lest I be incorrectly associated with the likes of Joss Whedon, Neil Gaiman, or a whole host of other clearly NON-feminists who hid behind the word to cover their actions.

or lost to the changing tastes of a new generation of media consumers

This is the part that just baffles me.

I rarely see anything but vitriol for anything anymore and it usually seems almost wholly unwarranted at the levels it's offered at.

I'm beginning to think it's not that people actually dislike the stuff that comes out, they're just so programmed to nitpick EVERYTHING that they don't remember how to enjoy something without finding fault. Or they don't want to risk saying they liked something only to have someone call their very right to an opinion in question. Or.. I don't know. It well and truly confuses me.

People have been trying to make it a thing for a while. I don't know whether or not it started at a news outlet, but multiple news outlets have picked it up, so...

This is the first complaint I've seen about any of the new Star Trek shows that didn't use the word "Woke" as a pejorative term. I'm impressed and appreciative of your well-thought-out take on it.

You actually do have some decent points, but I'm still an unabashed fan of the new stuff, especially Discovery/SNW.

It IS different, in all of the ways you describe, but every new trek has been a stylistic departure from the previous ones in some way, shape , or form, and I've been taking the plot armor Mary sue-ing as one piece of that. (Something DS9 also has to a degree, but they definitely held to the "difficult moral choices" aspect in spite of it).

Thanks for your opinion and insight.