Lynda

I like Session because it is anonymous (onion relay), decentralized, doesn't require a phone number, and I can have multiple accounts. But I still have to dependend on other people's generous infrastructure.

With Signal, you have to trust the server software (and hope it doesn't get hacked) to not collect a social graph, and the server address can be blocked/censored. Allowed one account per phone number. It's nice making communication easy, therefore will prevail as being the most popular...until a government or hacker takes down the service.

Session concerns/wishes:

1. Dependency on nodes to relay communication. I wish for independence.
2. Australia, but Signal USA can be just the same. Who knows what governments will force organizations to do (or prevent them from being monetized).
3. Wish I could have disposable aliases to handout (similar to email alias).

Matrix and XMPP still require a server, and trust. Gajim/XMPP seemed clunky to me. Tox over Tor is fast, simple, nice....but handling offline messages is a problem.

What I really want are these communication apps to be both client/server. Similar to torrenting/DHT and I2P. No need to administer a server, or for your server to become a dependency, or need to have a domain so all your contacts can reach the server.

Status might be better. Seems to offer everything Session has, but P2P. Not sure where DApps and crypto wallets is going though....seems like a lot of messengers are headed in that direction.

I have 10 to 13 messengers on my phone

Could Matrix bridges solve this?

Checkout dVPN's (distributed VPN's).

The sender is an idiot. Not only for the attack, but for assuming sending email is anonymous.

People need to understand the difference between E2EE, privacy, and anonymity. People need to understand what is encrypted, what isn't, and what anonymous means.