Maiq

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Is it correct to say that neo-liberal is economically liberal but not socially liberal?

Yes that would be fair. Neoliberalism is about freeing capital.

Overall, this single term seems to have a different meaning depending on the political section so it's hard to understand on such an out of context statement, I wish people would use more precise periphrases.

There is a certain amount of historical ignorance involved in this, I once fell into this category. There is also people taking the root word libre in any context to lump everyone into one category as the US conservatives do and some on the left seem to do this as well.

I don't agree with people on the left or right besmirching or confusing classical liberalism or social liberalism with neoliberalism. All three are different. I fall far more in the camp of social liberalism which is similar to classical liberalism but with more emphasis on the social contract and the thought that governance should play a role in that social contract for its citizenry. My post above left out social liberalism for brevity as I find the two to be very similar.

I would advise never taking anyone on any social platforms definitions for just about anything. Even mine. There is dictionaries and encyclopedia's for just this purpose, words have definitions often with interesting histories. Below are some links that will give you a far better understanding of the differences and their histories.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_liberalism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

I don't want to be someone who intrudes on a community I'm not a part of so mods or OP please delete if I am being in any way intrusive to your community. I've been waiting around debating if I should post. Really I just want OP to know people are listening and caring.

I read your original post and became emotionally invested as I think we all can relate to your hopes here. OP you have a mature reaction to the situation. My heart goes out to you! I'm still rooting for you OP! Someone wonderful will come your way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The root of the word liberal is liber which means to make free. Classical liberalism is about making people free. To liberate.

Neoliberalism to the contrary is a far right ideology brought to mainstream politics in the US by Ronald Reagan and in the UK by Margaret Thatcher. Neoliberalism differs greatly from classical liberalism because its about freeing capital not people. Neoliberalism was embraced by the most right wing elements of the democratic party in the early 90's by Bill Clinton and many others like Nancy Pelocy who restructured the party to reflect the new demand to serve capital over people.

This new desire to serve capital like the republicans who came before them was a challenge the the breadbasket the Republicans relied heavily upon. Needing to differentiate themselves the republicans created a new ideology of neoconservativism. The was led by republicans like Newt Gingrich.The republicans still needed to serve capital but also needed to differentiate themselves further from the democrat embracement of neoliberalism. This is the birth of their right moving ever right courting the never ending supply of batshit crazy.

As the right moved ever right the democrats stayed lock step behind them moving ever to the right. This was the demise of our democracy and led us directly into the fascism we face today.

While classical liberalism and neoliberalism share the root word liber, they are very different in their end goal and overall ideology. This is an important distinction that should not be ignored, overlooked or forgotten.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

My own brother, a god dammed shit sucking vampire. Does mom know?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

We also know that these back doors are entry points for other bad often state actors. There is no reasonable use for them to exist!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago

Their mistake is thinking that Schumer is the resistance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Wawa was the best!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

I rebuild my OS sometimes three times a year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

No gay man has ever tried to fuck me, I have a feeling that's about to change.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Tomorrow Never Dies kind of predicted or even spotlighted the overinflated ego driven psychopath's like Murdoch. The rise of zuckerburg/musk was soon to follow in the same vein.

An example of art imitating life imitating art.

 

The ability to add users to list's separated by group. With all the crazy stuff going on it would be helpful to be able to remember who is who. Maybe with a user defined flair next to their username on their posts and comments.

I don't like blocking views I don't agree with but would like an easy way to see at a glance what kind of person I'm dealing with and make it easier to see patterns in their discussions. If they were to be overly annoying, arguing in bad faith consistently or just a propaganda mouthpiece this would make it easier to recognize.

 

So with some cold weather coming to some of you I thought I'd remind you that it's a great time to season your pans.

Heat your house up a bit and enjoy some food afterword.

 

This was a placeholder image for a .gif I uploaded.

view more: next ›