MudMan

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hah. The framing from normie news is so weird. It's "bizarrely Disney is investing on Fortnite", instead of "Disney buys a stake on the people making Unreal, which at this point is like half of their and everybody else's VFX pipeline".

I wonder if the gaming news guys will have a better picture or the "Disney Fornite whaaaa?!" angle is what people will take away from this across the board.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, good luck getting past entertainment industry contracts.

But also... please, please, PLEASE make it so that political opinions and conspiracy theories can't be used to fire people. I double dare the CEO of a social media network, an electric car company and an aerospace company create a labor market where you can sue for discrimination for that reason.

I mean, I only want to see it if I can reset the timeline back to this point, but still, I REALLY want to see it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You haven't changed my mind, but now I'm mildly concerned about you and I'm here if you need help.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If the risk is that I'll have an upset stomach for two days like a toddler coming down from a sugar rush and my knees will also hurt for some reason, then yes, the WHO is right.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean... alcohol? You can already buy it easily prepared in all sorts of delicious ways.

Am I not in the spirit of the thing?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quit drinking if you haven't. The cost/benefit analysis on that one probably broke a few years ago and you just hadn't noticed.

Otherwise, meh, do your own thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's not lip service if I can send messages and other people can receive them.

Again, the status quo is you can't do that. Hell, in the spectrum of being dragged into reasonableness by the EU kicking and screaming, Meta is orders of magnitude below Apple here.

I mean, we can debate the finer points of the implementation once it's live, but for now this is nothing but positive movement. If people got over rejecting cookies they can get over dismissing warnings regarding interoperability, and if they don't, the same regulators have a history of re-spanking unruly malicious compliers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Ah, welcome time traveller. Can you take me back to 2008 with you? It was so much nicer there.

Seriously, every multiplayer game I've played the last few years has cross-platform play, both them and Sony have been making PC ports for ages and the reason I own a Series X is that it's quietly the best set-top media player out there, price-to-performance, and a cheap, convenient platform to play games on a TV.

I mean, if this is a prelude to them no longer making hardware I'd be bummed out, but not for those reasons.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

No, listen, get with the program. You're supposed to be very, very mad that a brand is losing its exclusives. You're also supposed to be very, very mad if any PC storefronts ever fund a game to sell as an exclusive, unless they're Steam. You're also never supposed to acknowledge the contradiction.

You're being a gamer wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really? I hadn't heard about that extremely prominent aspect of the game's development and marketing for thirty years. You don't happen to have any shocking news about the origins of Super Mario Bros. 2 by any chance, do you?

Alright, alright, I'll tone down the snark, it's just... yeah, that reads a certain way.

But also yeah, he kinda killed it. The Q2 soundtrack in particular has been in my music players longer than some European countries have existed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But what would be the point?

I swear, people have all these weird conspiracy theories around supposed "EEE" tactics, but Whatsapp already dominates the instant messaging space. It's pretty much a monopoly. The simplest solution to continue to dominate basically the entire market is do nothing.

Somebody explain to me how literally having the entire market to themselves in exclusive is somehow worse than any interoperability at all. You can't tank the use rate lower than zero.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, but you do realize all that you're describing is still more open than "this is a closed app that interops with nobody and also is permanently tied to your phone number", right?

I mean, I don't like the guys and I avoid their services whenever possible, but... man, as an unwilling Whatsapp user the ability to migrate without having to convince all my social circles to do anything but check a checkbox sounds like a huge step forward. I literally surfaced the idea of migrating to the WhatsApp group I thought would be most willing today and got nothing but crickets.

view more: ‹ prev next ›