Pandemanium

How can they argue that when we have clear precedent for other types of mandatory disclosures like TILA, the truth in lending act?

Especially at work, where you can't leave and should probably be focusing on the work.

Apparently they've decided once every 5 years is enough for women. Now I wonder if that's because of the doctor shortage...

I keep getting told that no one will want to see my travel photos. Maybe it's because I'd rather show them in person instead of posting on social media?

Yeah, I participated in the one that was a few days before the inauguration. Heard about it from the front page of the New York Times. I'm pretty sure I heard about the other 700 marches planned for inauguration day here on Lemmy since this is the only social media site I use.

When you post that much on a small, not-very-popular-yet site, people are going to get tired of seeing you. I'm pretty sure I've blocked you at least once just because you were the ONLY content I was seeing on my front page. Why would I or anyone else come to a place like this and be ok with only seeing content from one user, or the same meme over and over with slightly varying formats?

One time it snowed a foot or two in Seattle. I had a set of studded tires on a little Toyota Tercel and I swear I was the only fucker driving around. Uphill, downhill, cruising down the lumpy hard-packed freeway, didn't have any problems. Besides, if you get stuck in a Tercel you can just lift the whole rear of the car out of the snow with a second person. I really miss that car.

That's odd. I read most of The Myth of Normal and did not get anything like what you're saying from it. In fact, Mate mostly blamed "the system" for keeping people traumatized. I would have stopped reading immediately if he'd said anything like "children are too sensitive." Are you sure this Barkley isn't mischaracterizing Mate? Did Mate later change his stance about everything? Based on his book, I can't imagine why he would ever say the things you describe.

Oof. Soon every job is going to ask "HoW mAnY fOlLoWeRs Do YoU hAvE?"

Before you give up entirely, check out some of the areas surrounding Seattle. The capital is a bit more affordable and there are a lot of state jobs.

The person you're arguing with is on the Canadian instance, so likely living in Canada, where servers are paid real wages, not $2.75 or whatever. (If the real wages still aren't enough to live on, then Canada should probably be raising the minimum wage, rather than tipping a small percentage of their minimum wage workers.)

What? How is it a property grab if no one can live there? Only the stupidest and/or richest people would buy an uninsurable home. You can't get a mortgage without insurance, because the banks want to make sure they still have an asset to repossess if you default. Even if you were that rich, why would you throw your money away on something that will almost certainly be destroyed, sooner rather than later, without a way to recoup any of the cost? If a company like Zillow comes in and snaps up all the uninsurable homes in these regions, they'll be declaring bankruptcy within 5 years.