Quatlicopatlix

Dude saying just melting some ore is enought and then you basicly have a steam engine is so wild. Do you have any experience in metal working? How would you create the round parts like the piston and the bore? What about valves? The greek steam enigne woold have not created significant power for anything usefull. I would bet that most of you in this thread would not be able to build a steam engine from metal if you had acess to a home depot.

Ok just out of curiosity, how do you plan to generate power for your telegraphing? Also how do you plan to get the information out of the circuit on the other end?

It doesnt matter if we can define if it is a threat from a outside perspective with a historical context and it doesnt matter that god is actually not real because if you are a kid growing up and your parets tell you that you will die and go toll hell to be punished for eternety for some reason it has a big impact on you. These kids dont have the outside perspective or a history backround to know better, it will affect them. Even if it seems sus to them, untill a certain age kids will just beelieve what parents or other important figures tell them and if you grow up in an environment where everyone beelieves this it gets ingrained in you. It took a shit ton of time untill i aceppted that it was ok to also think guys are hot after being indoctrinated for most of my life. The deconstruction of all the bullshit and absolutly awfull morals and ethics you learn is very hard.

I think the imgaes should be swapped...

Ok so first if all anlinear electric motor is really expensive all the things that you said that were good about the aérotrain then dont apply annymore.

The amount of thrust you have to generate to stop a decently sized train is huge, that kind of turbine would be super loud and blow tons of debris around. If you brake with biting the rail you will also have lots of wear.

I dont even get why you would need to brake that fast? With a vehicle that heavy you will never be able to brake so fast that you could stop if something happened a hundret meters in fro t of you. And even if you bite down on the rail to stop near instantly the kinetic energy of a few hundret tons moving at lets say 70km/h would just destroy the rail.

Yea no i ddont think that a train with a turbine that uses kerosene is so great. With regeular trains you can recouparate while braking. Why would the aeotrain brake faster than a regular train?

Have you read the article? It says it is not a kernel level anti cheat so it DHOULD work on linux but was not speciffially testez with proton.

Yes but if you look at the big shit companies öile unilever etc. in the food sector you will quickly realise that it is really hard to not buy from one of them. They habe so many sub companies and have their hand in nearly everything.

The nutrition score is a german thing that our nestle lobby minister pushed. Its worthless because it compares the products in arbitrery categories with each others so a nutri score of A on sweets just means that these are the "healthiest" sweets but they are still far worse than something from another category that has a "lower" score. The worst thing is that the categories are weird sometimes so two products that you would think are in the same category sometimmes arent and you cant compare them withoud looking at the category on the package every time.

I mean the thing with overloading is that your functions should have some difference in the paraameters they take, if you make 3 functions that have the exact same parameters of course you will not be shure what the compiler does(alötho i dont think that it would compile? But i dont think that i have ever done that)

If you have a foo(int x float y) and a foo( int x ) function and you call it with just a x as parameter you can be shure the compiler will call your second function. If the compiler for some reasson tried to use the first foo it would throw a error because it wants a int and a float and you just gave it one int.

I am shure that

Foo(){ static int x =0;
X +=1; Printf("%d",); }

Foo(); every time foo is called x increments so print will be 1,2,3,4... for every call of foo

Printf("%d",x); <- wont work because x cant be acessed here, it is out of scope.

I mean in c/c++ statics arent really globals, you cant acess the from outsside their scope can you? They just retain their value or am i wrong?

[] for arrays is the thing that has been used forever so why should we not use it annymore?

Overloading is also pretty usefull, overloading class constructors is great. I am not a 40 year experience developer but learning c/c++ i never thought that was so bad.

Yea what is wrong with static members? What do they even mean with "[] for arrays"? Why is that bad? Method overloding is bad? why??