ReversalHatchery

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

oh, postmarket. no it does not work anywhere, then, especially since phones are in the focus in the title

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

many suspect that CEXs do price fixing

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Google says this “list is not exhaustive and doesn’t fully represent all the criteria used to display the badge” and that “other factors contribute to the evaluation,” though “fulfilling these requirements significantly increases your chances.”

Initial VPN apps that have the Verified badge include Nord, hide.me, and Aloha Browser.

why do I have the feeling that mullvad and proton will never get this badge?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

(how) does it work on phones?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I had the same experience when controlling a traditional client on a TV months ago, I think every time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

it is today that nearly no reviews are worth anything. what even is that bullshit that they only rate from 7 to 10 because below 7 is somehow already the worst of worst

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

sorry for that. but what I wanted to say is that revolut is a quite anti-consumer bank in my perception

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

privacy protection with a service that's only accessible through an ownership controlling, datamining-filled smartphone app? it was just a joke, right?

if they do this on your phone, what are they doing with your transaction data..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

kiwi was always a shady browser, as it was revealed on the ffupdater issue tracker

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

why is it important, and where is it used, though? on windows you cant make symlinks without admin rights by default, and steam usually does not need admin rights to install a game

 

Recently there was a post where the OP pitched an idea for a service related to this community. I don't want to go into details but the post's text has shown that maybe there's some misunderstanding around the technology, and a considerable amount of us also thought that it's not a good idea.
The post was removed (noticed because I couldn't reply to someone) probably because the OP felt shame for their "failed" idea, but I think we shouldn't delete posts for reasons like this.

The post created an interesting discussion around the idea with useful info. It's useful to have things like these for future reference, for similar discussions in the future.
This is an anonymous forum, so there's no shame in recommending things, when you do that politely like it was done in that case.

 

Introduction of the first Managing Director

 

I have just installed the tmuxinator 3.0.5 ruby gem with gem 3.2.5 and the --user-install parameter, and to my surprise the gem was installed to ~/.gem/ruby/2.7.0/bin/.

Is this a misconfiguration? Will it bite me in the future? I had a quick look at the environment and haven't found a variable that could have done this. Or did I just misunderstand something? I assume that the version of gem goes in tandem with the version of ruby, at least regarding the major version number, but I might be wrong, as I'm not familiar with it.

I have checked the version of gem by running gem --version. This is on a Debian Bullseye based distribution.

 

The video is a short documentary on Trusted Computing and what it means to us, the users.

If you like it and you are worried, please show it to others.
If you are not the kind to post on forums, adding it to your Bio on Lemmy and other sites, in your messaging app, or in your email/forum signature may also be a way to raise awareness.

view more: next ›