Shardikprime

Ah yeah, double think

Winning the popular vote is being unpopular

Winning the election is losing the election

Not voting for Trump is voting for Trump

War is peace

Freedom is slavery

There are not 4 lights, but 5 lights

The stunlock continues and intensifies

Lol no. Studies have been done about this. The average voter doesn't give five shits if the candidate is a man or a woman.

3 chances at guessing what the average voter cares about.

Hint: it's not gender policies, pronouns or social culture wars

As long as you need those "Rock chewing stupid" people to win an election, and you keep thinking of them as such, you will KEEP losing elections

Those "rock chewing stupid" people are LITERALLY American workers. You know, the people that for good or bad keep the country running?

And then democrats have the gall to call themselves the party of the worker man.

Pathetic

The perma stun proceeds at pace

Ironic

Imagine having 4 years to prepare

With all the state apparatus behind them announcing day and night that Trump was "literally the worst human bean ever"

Basically all the universities and all the highly educated population by their side

With massive approval from their voter base

With huge sums of money for propaganda in the private media.

With all the considerably large powers of the current executive

Able to pass laws

Able to influence worldwide political movements to bash their opposition at any time through grants

Able to start or stop wars worldwide should the need arise

And they still lost to Trump LMAO 🤣

So, civ v was right, the only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy, is its inefficiency.

Isn't this like the whole SCRUM framework

Nothing wrong, actually a big promoter, the thing is, the people who complain a lot about:

-not having enough jobs

-salary being too low

If you add automation to the mix, a lot of the people complaining about it will have to, sooner or later, face the reality that a lot of clerical work can be automated leaving large swats of the population who never realized they needed to re-skill, in a job market that for them looks unpredictable.

In this particular case, maybe about 80% of these jobs might be automated in the near future, which will also collapse the idea that, for government to work, it has to be as big and bloated as possible, and prove at the same time that a lean, less expensive and efficient government structure is more desirable in the end.

This will replicate over other verticals. We already have fully automated convenience stores, coffee shops, pizza shops and burger shops. Add a cheap LLM like deep seek to the mix for customer service and you got yourself a standard shop but with no social security loads or expenses. Maybe one human supervisor for each 100 shops or so.

The benefits make economic actors to lean more to the fully automated establishments.

Others, manually managed will keep existing but will be the minority. These will be more expensive.

People who aim for these types of jobs, should be re-skilling in AI and how to operate it, even if it is tangential to their fields, just in case they want to be that human supervisor, or do the maintenance on the service devices used in them.

Lemmy: "Fuck that, I'll vote blue no matter who. You can't tell me what to do"

Democrats: