Splitdipless

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Splitdipless 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'll take the party that is marginally better than the rest. Why wouldn't you select the best option?

[–] Splitdipless 5 points 1 year ago

I think that's what they meant.

[–] Splitdipless 2 points 1 year ago

Screw them. Let this be a lesson to any new business that thinks of investing in moving to the area. Kill any chance at a job in the area and let the community rot away.

[–] Splitdipless 2 points 1 year ago

What about cigars?

[–] Splitdipless 1 points 1 year ago

"We've got 4 AOPS, and we only have people to run 1." Yeah CFRC has let them down...

[–] Splitdipless 9 points 1 year ago

As a former card-carrying Conservative, I'm already deciding to vote ABC.

[–] Splitdipless 1 points 2 years ago

If the tempest started anywhere, it was WO Topp in his public speaking, social media presence, and led 'protest marches' in opposition to the policy.

[–] Splitdipless 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Let's not forget that this is a guilty plea. Even WO Topp believes himself guilty.

[–] Splitdipless 1 points 2 years ago

Oh no! Anyways...

[–] Splitdipless 0 points 2 years ago

I despise that there's "legitimacy" given to a lot of woo out there. I mean, there's medicine, there's things that sometimes works that we can't figure out, and then there's people just trying to see what shit works (pun intended). Maybe we should label some things as "experimental" or not call it something that sounds "official."

[–] Splitdipless 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Xor" is exclusive, which means it is one, the other, but not both. In logic, an inclusive disjunction would be "or." The problem is people don't use xor and or; the use of just "or" makes things difficult to understand sometimes.

[–] Splitdipless -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't want to pay a purchasing lawyers bill? Don't get sued.

view more: ‹ prev next ›