Tamo240

That is also my point. Don't worry though, you keep impeaching him until he dissolves congress.

You're response being 'yeah but you can be impeached multiple times' exactly demonstrates the weakness of that action.

Yep that's my point

I disagree, I think the removal of ads is often painted as a benefit that had inherent value. Look at YouTube premium or Prime video. Both haven't actually improved their offering, just made it worse by introducing ads and insisting users that don't want to see ads have to pay for the privilege of not being advertised to.

This means the total price adds up to higher than 100% of the product value, because it's a 'premium' version that comes without advertisement inconvenience.

Didn't you guys try that before?

Paying for the product and paying to not be inconvenienced by ads have become separate things. The first is standard business, the second is extortion.

I think what you're trying to say is that the social commentary has lost a lot of nuance, as well as the general quality of the writing going down, in which case I agree. Kinda toeing the line of the 'everything is woke now' crowd though, to which I would say you haven't seen/understood much Doctor Who if you think social issues are only recently a part of the stories.

For the record the Rosa Parks ep was one of my favourites for Jodie, but it's a low bar.

That goes without saying. You bringing it up what people are down-voting, because of the implication that this somehow justifies the actions of the IDF in Palestine.

Feel free to contribute any features you feel it is missing

0.1% would be generous for how many people should be happy.

Why does any one employee have the ability to unilaterally move this much value? Even in non-malicious circumstances that doesn't seem like a good way of organising a currency?

Why disappointing? I think it looks promising,lalthough the chances of it reaching the heights of S1 are low.

If he ever denies team orders to switch the cars they'll stick someone else in the seat