so does the fetus technically not have a skeleton before then?
The cartilaginous pre-bones would still be a skeleton. Sharks have skeletons, but don't have any bones for example.
so does the fetus technically not have a skeleton before then?
The cartilaginous pre-bones would still be a skeleton. Sharks have skeletons, but don't have any bones for example.
Already did, I agree with many of his points, and disagree with others.
When are you going to answer my question now?
or are you going ti finally fuck off, or is your autism making that impossible?
I’m not, but that doesn’t matter.
Took you long enough, and yes, it does matter.
I’ve answered every other question.
You have not, because I asked many, many times what science have you done?
Constantly conflate accuracy with precision
Wrong, I have already informed you you fell for the Barnum effect.
Believe in unfalsifiable truths in the empirical sciences
The existence of gravity is unfalsifiable, the explanation for it is. And when people discuss lack of absolute knowledge, that is what they are talking about, and that is what the video is talking about.
Think that credentials themselves are evidence
Nope, that's you lacking the ability to read once again.
And when are you going to read those papers I sent you?
Brilliant, I hope it got published.
Fuck off liar, or answer one of the many actual questions I posed you, or just read the papers I sent you.
No, you won't do any of that so just fuck off.
I explicitly remember making fun of Matt for his haircut in grade 6, which was 2001. I still consider that being a kid.
As someone who was a kid through the 90s, we made fun of the kids with bowl cuts. They were cringe then.
How about we learn to recognize satire and joke posts.
Amazing how people on Lemmy are unable to understand an obvious joke post. Do we need to flag every satirical piece with a giant red "JOKE" button for you guys not to take it seriously?
Please post said excerpt, I must read this paper.
Yeah, that is just absurd and downright scary logic they are trying to employ.
He said as an example against gravity being non-absolute was an example of imagining a universe with floating islands. But that isn't a universe without gravity, that universe has gravity holding together the rocks of the, mountain and the planet above it. Sure gravity works differently than expected, but that is the theory of gravity, not the existence of it.
A universe with no gravity is one in which all matter just flies away from all other matter endlessly. No stars, no planets, no chemical reactions. And such a universe cannot exist with life in it, so you cannot logically imagine a universe with us in it that has no gravity. Thus we can know gravity does exist. It's the how gravity works that is up for debate in question, but it does absolutely exist.
You're too stupid to talk to it seems, because no where does he say gravity itself does not absolutely exist, but says that our ideas of how gravity exists could be wrong.