TheLepidopterists

I have to say, LiberalSocialist2 is a shadow of the original

It came into your head for a reason, liar. I guess going forward, nobody should assume that you mean what you say.

Honestly I wouldn't even much of a problem if they just invaded Donbas

How could they possibly invade the Donbas at all when they were invited?

Hey, coward, explain how you can simultaneously believe that the Donbas is independent and that when Russian troops entered their territory at their request that constituted an invasion.

Explain or admit that you don't consistently believe in self determination.

Yeah it's certainly much better than for example, Assange, but it's wild to me that people just gloss over the US surveillance state at this point

Few people here think that the CPC is "genuinely dedicated to communism"

I know Edward Snowden is a libertarian or some dumb shit but man he really did get himself exiled for nothing.

"I assume that the enemies designated by my rulers are worse than my admittedly very wicked rulers, based entirely on testimony from those same wicked rulers."

I'm sure it's best that it's not leaded now, but I strongly wish to smell it now.

Hey since you're refusing to answer in the other thread, you claimed that you supported Donbas independence and also stated that you would have less (but not presumably zero) problem with Russia "only" invading them.

I asked how, if the DPR and LPR were the legitimate governments of the Donbas, and they invited Russia, Russia could possibly have invaded them at all and you responded to a bunch of other ones and not that one, probably because you'd basically walked into admitting you were acting in bad faith for the whole thread?

Anyways can you explain here how Russia could invade a state that was asking them to send soldiers?

I'm almost certain they can, I think they just lack the posting power of

You can argue about anything, but these countries are absolutely US vassals.

I'd expect US vassals like Canada, Japan and the EU to side with the US.