WeirdGoesPro

I was about to say—we lost the panhandle, and nobody realistically knows what lives there anyway.

10 million seems low only because there are realistic things that can cost more than that. Nothing an individual could buy costs a billion. That’s the heinous part of billionaires in my opinion—it is just numbers on a screen for them to measure their dicks with. No realistic change of lifestyle is happening after the first billion, yet they continue to inhale dollars out of greed and habit.

There are a lot of prescription treatments for balding these days that seem to work. I have never personally used them, but I know people who have, and they seemed to stop going bald.

Jack Dougherty will be the worst soldier.

So you want to sleep with your fiancée? I feel like I’m missing something. That is pretty normal.

Exactly.

In the words of Anton LaVey, they are addicted to the “good guy badge”. They’d rather die feeling morally clean than get their hands dirty to save their country, neighbors, and values. The liberals I hear judging people for violent protest the most are the ones who are privileged enough to have not personally felt the consequences yet.

In my opinion, it is a grotesque cowardice to admonish people for fighting for their lives just because you don’t have to.

I think that part of it is that the authorities are confident that we can’t do much. In the 60’s, wide scale protest that was not a preamble to a riot was rare. In recent times, everyone expects things to go off peacefully and just come to an end at some point. This plays directly into their hands, and they are confident that we are toothless.

It’s not the kink, but the table manners that I shame.

Y’all nasty.

I’m not saying that they manipulated results or anything, I only think their method of mailing 10,000 people wasn’t thorough enough to draw the conclusion they drew.

It barely matters in the end—the golden turd won.

https://www.surveylegend.com/customer-insight/generational-differences-in-surveys/

A quick google search shows that there are massive differences in how willing different generations are to respond to surveys, especially relating to how they are delivered. 40% of gen-z will abandon a survey if they are asked for personally identifying information.

Another user in this thread mentioned that this particular survey was delivered by mail, which means that this was only able to reach people with a mailing address, who actually read non essential mail, and who are willing to respond to this survey.