WilloftheWest

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

We both know who cares. Who would derail a discussion about bigotry by making pedantic observations on grammar or language?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do they have a different tattoo or are you referring to the one circling their arm? It looks like the inscription on the One Ring to me, though I definitely could be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Conversely, a lot of people abstain from drinking. Entire cultures abstain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Ah shit. Reading is hard sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A pint is 568ml.

Edit: the extra 30ml might be accounted for with the patented Guinness widget, a little ball of nitrogen gas that ruptures and forms a foamy head when the can is cracked.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

GPT4 is wrong and it doesn’t require a price per litre comparison to prove it.

4 cans at 440ml cost £4.50. Therefore 12 cans at 440ml cost £13.50, £1.50 less than 12 cans at 330ml.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The fact you made such a connection says a lot about you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree on a personal level. FOSS software is much more convenient for my usecase of writing papers/typsetting notes, some automation, writing a program that works for me, and browsing/videos.

On the level of someone working in academia, it can be incredibly inconvenient if not outright impossible to implement. I can manage if I come across a bug in some FOSS software in my personal usage. An enterprise encountering an error with some utility whose support forum is a discord server: completely unacceptable. The entire printing service being offline because CUPS is temperamental: completely unacceptable.

Enterprises are the core customers of these inconvenient pieces of software with subscription based models.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

On a phoneline service that I have to call about twice a month, you also get a frequent click and a second-long pause in the music, that makes you think you’ve connected to an operator. Given how the service is outright malicious to its users, it wouldn’t surprise me if that was hard coded into the system to keep callers on edge.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s the thing: you’re proving the idiom in the way that you’re arguing. Naively, one would expect that comparing fruit is easy; after all, they’re both fruit. Two nations have supposedly, in an official capacity, made the same statement (which I don’t believe without you providing a source, and yes the burden is on you).

The thing is that these are all superficial observations on complex entities. The idiom of comparing two fruits is a common idiom in many cultures, and it’s not for want of an internet commenter pointing out that they’re sweet, have seeds, and are similar colour.

General point: practice making pithy arguments based on well researched points. I’m struggling to see an actual point in the drivel you’re writing. It isn’t a reading comprehension issue; I read and write dense academic articles for a living. Short, pithy sentences are simply better writing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's no reason 2 fruits can't be compared.

I find it hard to believe that you’re not familiar with the famous phrase “comparing apples and oranges,” which is specifically about attempting to compare incomparable items.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Sorry I had to get that out.

Cringe. You’re an anonymous person interacting on the internet, not the main character of a sitcom.

view more: ‹ prev next ›