Womdat10

This is just a bad argument, if an omniscient being did exist, then it would know the statement was false, I'm sure this was supposed to be a logic loop, but it isn't one.

I dont have them on hand, but I've seen a few polls in swing states where 5 or so percent more undecided voters would be more likely to vote for Harris if she promised an arms embargo, as opposed to less likely.

Yes obviously, but it doesn't excuse the other.

So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn't a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

I was about to say that this doesn't belong on not the onion because this is totally realistic. Then I realized this was the onion

Both of those are in essence a vote for trump. It is a binary choice.

That doesn't work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

I'm assuming you've never seen her debates, or statements about the issue. If you had, you'd know that she pledged to continue supporting Isreal.

Tell me please, if one person committed a murder, and another person committed 2 murders, would both be evil, or just the one who did 2? Also, this isn't advocating for non-voting, just pointing out that both people are evil. It also never says that they are equally evil, so this isn't a "both sides" argument either.

And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren't any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

"Her form of genocide is much more elegant than her opponent's." I'm not sure where you're getting that?