WrenFeathers

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

So….. impeachment?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Bets that somehow, for some reason, they’ll be found to have violated the law as a result of their not violating the law- and trump’s Bizarro World goons will figure out how to shut them down because of It.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hate to be that person, but now that they know people are willing to pay it- it’s probably not going to ever go back down.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Well, here’s how it is, and I offer no apologies that you don’t like it:

You say the cow cares? I say the cow never asked for your advocacy. And we both know you cannot prove it has. So, in reality, it’s easily just as safe to assume that the cow never asked for your support as it would be to assume they did. And it’s also safe to assume they are entirely clueless about the concept of meat consumption, and even if they were, they’d be entirely indifferent to it because they lack the ability to conceive even the slightest notion of their own mortality- because they’re cows.

Look… People love to install human emotions and complex thought processes in everything we see. Up to and including inanimate object. It’s how we can connect with the world around us. If it feels what we feel, we can understand it better.

It’s a cow. It doesn’t think about shit. It has a natural preservation of life because that is built into survival instinct because that is part of how propagation of species works.

And no one asked your opinion on the moral responsibility of consuming meat either. You just offer it. So when I say that people should butt-out of others legal decisions regarding dietary habits- it’s shit like what you’re song here that illustrates my point.

What someone wants to eat, provided it is legal- is only considered to be your business to you and you alone- not to them. So your opinions of their consumption of cheeseburgers is every bit as important to an omnivore as the opinions of Christian fundamentalists are to the LGBTQ.

They don’t care.

Done arguing this. It’s obnoxious and a waste of time to bother. The only lesson learned here is a neutral stance doesn’t exist in a discussion with vegans.

Mistake only made once. Trust me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah… you’re definitely misinterpreting it. And again, like everyone’s else- arguing false equivalency.

This is not at all like defending slavery. This is telling people to butt-out of the dietary decisions that have nothing to do with you.

If you want an argument that IS similar…

What telling others what they should and shouldn’t eat is not u like those that presume it’s their responsibly to tell other who they can and cannot love.

Someone eating cheeseburgers has absolutely no impact on your life and doesn’t hurt you in the least bit. Just like who someone decides to love has no impact on anyone else.

If you don’t like someone’s diet, that’s a YOU problem. And this goes for both sides of the argument. Though I don’t see any meat-eaters whining about this.

Imagine that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

And corn = no gluten, which = I can has!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

My brother and I are American born of Irish parents. They both have dual-citizenship and wanted us to grow up in the US (Things were different back in the early 70’s). Trust me, I know clotted cream.

And real butter??

Yeah, so…. My girlfriend and I make it all the time when we’re able to buy heavy cream in bulk, because it takes a LOT of it for such a small amount of butter due to the process of how it’s made.

It’s also a bit of an effort that we’re not always in the mood to do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

The ToS would like to disagree with you.

Specifically:

The website and the agreement will be governed by and construed per the laws of the following countries and/or states:

  • The Netherlands
  • Republic of Finland
  • Federal Republic of Germany
[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Not in the US, where .world is held

The ToS would like to disagree with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)
 

Found this song watching the show Suits. It’s gorgeous!

 

On IOs, If I were to, for example, remove a comment for “misinformation,” when the word is typed out and autocomplete is used, submitting the action via the remove button doesn’t work. Essentially, pressing it does nothing at all. My theory is that It could have to do with the additional space that autocomplete creates, but even backspacing doesn’t correct the issue.

The only way to resolve this is to start over, and manually type out the entire word or phrase without using autocomplete or autocorrect.

Not a huge issue, but I don’t know if this causes other problems elsewhere.

(Admittedly, I know nothing at all about coding… including if that’s even the correct term for it)

 

A few Reddit apps did this back in the day and it was very convenient. If there were a link to Reddit posted anywhere, selecting it would open the app instead of the webpage.

(Really hope I’m explaining this correctly. I’m not family with the terminology I’m probably needing here)

Is this going to be a thing, or… could it be a thing?

EDIT: This is for iOS by the way.

 

That PleasantPolitics bot is obnoxious! Also, there’s a few mods that use mass auto-removal bots when someone so much as posts comments that they don’t like.

It would be nice to be able to filter these out of the modlog feed. (If it’s even possible)

 
 
 

If I go to ban a user, it shows successful in the app, but no mod logs will show the user banned, and they’re able to continue to post- after a ban via Voyager app

I have to go outside of voyager to do any ban moderation. Has this always been a thing?

EDIT: it seems it works fine for permanent bans. But not for temporary bans.

view more: next ›