ZeroGravitas

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

That's not where I live, that's where I bide my time.

[–] [email protected] 175 points 3 days ago (4 children)

"for-profit detention facility"

And there you have it, folks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think you nailed it. In the grand scheme of things, critical thinking is always required.

The problem is that, when it comes to LLMs, people seem to use magical thinking instead. I'm not an artist, so I oohd and aahd at some of the AI art I got to see, especially in the early days, when we weren't flooded with all this AI slop. But when I saw the coding shit it spewed? Thanks, I'll pass.

The only legit use of AI in my field that I know of is an unit test generator, where tests were measured for stability and code coverage increase before being submitted to dev approval. But actual non-trivial production grade code? Hell no.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

You know, I was happy to dig through 9yo StackOverflow posts and adapt answers to my needs, because at least those examples did work for somebody. LLMs for me are just glorified autocorrect functions, and I treat them as such.

A colleague of mine had a recent experience with Copilot hallucinating a few Python functions that looked legit, ran without issue and did fuck all. We figured it out on testing, but boy was that a wake up call (colleague in question has what you might call an early adopter mindset).

[–] [email protected] 214 points 4 days ago (21 children)

A 100% accurate AI would be useful. A 99.999% accurate AI is in fact useless, because of the damage that one miss might do.

It's like the French say: Add one drop of wine in a barrel of sewage and you get sewage. Add one drop of sewage in a barrel of wine and you get sewage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Yakkety Yak

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Mate, can you imagine president Vance? Careful what you wish for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Don't think it started that way, but at this point this is a cheap way of identifying and marginalising overt opposing media organisations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

No argument from me. But we're talking about a byproduct of a commercial endeavour, without financial gain there would be less reason to do it in the first place.

If nothing else, at least they make less money and I have a better experience online.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure, but look at it this way. Fingerprints are benefiting the advertisers, and their purpose is to better target ads. Well I say fingerprint the hell out of everything, but I'll make sure no ads get through. If we all do that, what's the added value of fingerprinting then?

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes your honor I lit up but didn't inhale.

14
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

This is the only picture I have left of them. I need some help restoring this and removing the background, so that a printed version of it could go on their headstone.

Would really appreciate your help.

https://imgur.com/z0WhYaR

view more: next ›