Zotora

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Save me a seat

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

It does feel a bit like building a statue of the animal that killed your friend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You could also locally run it through Whisper from Open AI to create subs and then embed them using ffmpeg.

I do this for vids in languages i dont speak.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ah, perfect!

Knew there would be somthing! 😄

 

Hey all,

Just wondering if there is a list somewhere that I can't find that lists the comunities that Programming.dev have defederatd from (or the inverse)?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

The short version;

  1. There was probably a legit sighting of a few drones at some point. (Its a pretty regular occurrence).
  2. It got amplified by a few people.
  3. News media amped it up more
  4. People started looking up in the sky at night and not knowing what they were looking at.
  5. MANY many reports of drones are just regular air traffiic, or planets, or stars.
  6. More people started looking. Some of then launching their own drones to look at the drones.
  7. And it just kinda snowballed from there.

TLDR; People looking at the sky for the first time discover its full of lights from various sources which they can't id.

Note: I do find it rather amusing how many people apparently can't ID an aircraft flying overhead or know what an out-of-focus star looks like. I guess theres always new people learning new things. Just wouldn't have put those two things on my list.

Edit: A fair bit of it is the usual "Aliens" people making noise, and im sure there are plenty of others farming engagement for $$$. I don't think we are going to get a clear picture for a while. We will have to wait for the hype / hysteria to die down before we get any reasonable assesment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

To quote the article;

"The Pauli Exclusion Principle doesn’t only explain why matter is solid, but also why it occupies the amount of space that it does. Again: it isn’t just the uncertainty principle and electrostatic repulsion that’s responsible for volume; if matter were made of bosons, it wouldn’t occupy space in the same fashion that it does when it’s made of fermions"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

The short version: It's the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

6 paragraphs from the end of the article they actually get to the point.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

He certainly did.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Seems to be working then! (From lemmy)

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago

Guess they are just saying the quiet part out loud now?

They can't control the narrative, and they don't like it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Neat idea.

RSS is still how most podcasts get distributed. (Excluding Spotify)

view more: next ›