ada

joined 1 week ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

There is a manual way to import posts one at a time, so that's a option.

That's exactly how I did it when we spun up the new instance.

And once all the of the content was here, we transferred kicked off the transfer process.

It's not feature complete, as you said. In our case, it broke, because of a bug around the way it handled community names that use upper case letters, which required editing the database to fix

But despite that, at the end of it, we have the old content on the new community. Even if it doesn't federate, it's not lost

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The piefed community migration feature does import old posts, but it doesn't refederate them, so they'll only be visible to local users

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So you allow them to influence other people with their ideas?

No, absolutely not. I run instances to give gender diverse folk safe spaces. I ban transphobes the instant they appear, I don't debate them. Offline, I'm visible, active and proud. I am an volunteer at my local parkrun, I've spoken openly with people at my workplace, I've hosted a queer community radio show, I host a vodcast, and I used to be active in organising events for my local gender diverse community. Because what gets people to change their minds, is an emotional connection with the group they're targeting. When they start to see us as people, just the same as them, then they start to make choices that aren't harmful to us, and they start to wind back their own arguments.

Pushing back is incredibly important, but debating them isn't effective. Like most people, when confronted with debate points in regards to a topic they hold on to for emotional reasons, they will shift goal posts, and only see the things that validate what they already believe, whilst ignoring the things that challenge it. When they get to the point where they're ready to challenge their ideas (because their emotional position has shifted) then, lots of the talking points you would normally debate become relevant, but by that stage, it's a discussion, not a debate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

I drink lots of water, but I add coffee...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (12 children)

You can't rationally debate someone out of a position they didn't reach through rational consideration.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Something fell over in our server, so Kaity is spinning up a new server and rebuilding lemmy on it

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (5 children)

You can't opt out of capitalism. You can opt out of not funding Rowling

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We bypass the issue. We use DJI mini mics, which allow you to connect multiple mics to a single base receiver, and that receiver appears as a stereo sound source.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago

If making excuses for virulent transphobes is the best of lemmy in your mind, I'm concerned about what would qualify as the worst...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (5 children)

like madlad, woosh, etc

I haven't used Reddit for years, and I have no idea about those terms. If they're a Reddit thing, I don't recognise them.

Lemmy is also less tolerant of debate bros.

So yeah, they're different

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

As I said, if not voluntarily giving money to or making excuses for someone who will use that money to hurt people is too much to ask of someone, then their context and intent is quite clear.

Including yours.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

"I grew up with Harry Potter and loved it and I'm interested to see the new [whatever]" is not equivalent to promoting transphobia.

It is equivalent, because in this case, it is literally promoting transphobia. One of the worlds leading transphobes will directly benefit from the profits this show makes, and will directly turn those profits against dismantling the rights of trans folk.

This isn't an analogy, it's not dramatic license, or over exaggeration.

You cannot make a black and white determination like that without context and intent.

If you know she will hurt trans people with the money she makes, and you do things that continue to make her money (which includes just advocating for continued consumption of her work), it is black and white, and the context and intent are quite visible.

By itself, it doesn't mean someone is transphobic. But it does mean that at the very least, personal nostalgia is more important to that person than the harm their actions cause. And that is plenty of intent and context.

view more: ‹ prev next ›