arymandias

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Interesting that you can still see the effects of WWI in the north.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Gotta love big naturals, them tit-ass biggies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“A political revolution has begon” and “tickets sold out in just two days” don’t really make sense together.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I'm starting to get the feeling that we are both repeating ourselves, but this is not a just a side effect, it is systematic. Turning an idea into property means only capital can play the game. In effect patents do two things: Firstly they inhibits innovation, the exact opposite of what they are supposed to do, this should be ground enough to get rid of them. Second they entrench big players, big players have more money to play the patent game and so tend to win patent fights regardless of merit. So besides not achieving their so called stated goal they also have a huge negative externality. And all this before we even take patent trolls into account.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It requires capital to obtain a patent and to defend a patent, workers are inherently excluded from this proces.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

It’s a legal tool that turns ideas into property. This allows capital to exercise power over it and profit through it, and on top of that inhibits innovation. So l’d say there is no use or abuse, it’s a bad legal framework that doesn’t achieve societal benefits.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

The most efficient and sustainable battery is none at all, in some cases this is not possible, but for trains the alternative is literally older than sliced bread.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

I tend to be principally against patents in general, as research suggests they actually stifle innovation rather than incentivize it. But in this case I’d say ‘let them fight, and may they both lose’.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Critical support for having human connections on the bosses time.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Oh no!

Anyway.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Luxemburg: 🇱🇺

Die Niederlanden: 🇳🇱

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (5 children)

What is the thesis of this meme, that people are just stupid and there is no underlying problem or system that can be improved?

Science is often communicated to the public via either companies, politics, or the media. Which al have their own interests and issues in representing “scientific facts”. To give some examples of the “science” people have been exposed to: These new pain killers are perfectly save and absolutely not addictive. Making health care accessible is actually bad for the economy and will be more expensive in the end. Or the numerous articles on outlier papers published in the media that conclude that it’s actually healthy to [insert obviously unhealthy habit here (sponsored by some industry group)].

Science has a communication problem, and the communication conduits have a huge credibility problem. The results of which made an already bad pandemic even worse.

view more: ‹ prev next ›