bartleby1

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

(letter was OCR’d from this scanned letter)

We write regarding Apple's potential anticompetitive treatment of the Beeper Mini messaging application. We have long-championed increased competition, innovation, and consumer choice in the digital marketplace. To protect free and open markets, it is critical for the Antitrust Division to be vigilant in enforcing our antitrust laws. That is why together we have led efforts in Congress to ensure the agency has the authorities, tools, and resources necessary to police abuses of market power.

Earlier this month, Beeper introduced Beeper Mini, an interoperable messaging service that allows users of the Android mobile operating system to communicate with users of Apple's iMessage service. Previously, Android users were unable to securely communicate with iMessage users and were relegated to using decades-old, unencrypted SMS technology. Within days of its launch, Beeper Mini users began to experience service disruptions. Apple admitted it took action to disable Beeper Mini, citing security and privacy concerns for iMessage users. Apple executives have previously admitted the company leverages iMessage to lock users into Apple's ecosystem of devices and services. Beeper Mini threatened to reduce this leverage creating more competitive mobile applications market, which in turn a more competitive mobile device market.

Earlier this year the Department of Commerce released a report titled Competition in the Mobile Application Ecosystem, describing Apple as a "gatekeeper" with a "monopoly position" in its mobile app ecosystem. The Department of Commerce observed that "antitrust enforcement is essential for ensuring competition in the mobile app ecosystem." These findings are consistent with those of numerous other antitrust enforcers and international competition authorities. In December 2015, Beeper's Chief Executive Officer, Eric Migicovsky, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights. He expressed concern that dominant messaging services would use their position to impose barriers to interoperability and prevent Beeper entering and delivering services that consumers want. Given Apple's recent actions, that concern appears prescient.

As you know, interoperability and interconnection have long been key drivers of competition and consumer choice in communications services, from telephones to email. Startups and small businesses drive innovation, create jobs, and can disrupt entrenched incumbents when allowed to compete. But consumers will never benefit from competition if dominant firms are allowed to snuff out that competition at its incipiency.

We are therefore concerned that Apple's recent actions to disable Beeper Mini harm competition, eliminate choices for consumers, and will discourage future innovation and investment in interoperable messaging services. We also fear these types of tactics may more broadly chill future investment and innovation from those that seek to compete with existing digital gatekeepers. Thus, we refer this matter to the Antitrust Division to investigate whether this potentially anticompetitive conduct by Apple violated the antitrust laws.

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Watch on Telegram or on twitter

 

Once enacted, it will be the British counterpart to the EU's Digital Markets Act.

This bill is expected to force interoperability with many things, including messaging platforms.

iPhone has a 51% market share in the UK.

Wikipedia article | bills.parliament.uk

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Apple appears to be deliberately blocking iMessages from being delivered to ~5% of Beeper Mini users. Uninstalling and reinstalling Beeper Mini fixes the issue.

Affected Beeper Cloud users - please contact Beeper Help. We can fix it very easily for you if you let us know.

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Where we gather all the latest news about Beeper, Matrix, and messaging apps and protocols

 

At Apple, we build our products and services with industry-leading privacy and security technologies designed to give users control of their data and keep personal information safe. We took steps to protect our users by blocking techniques that exploit fake credentials in order to gain access to iMessage. These techniques posed significant risks to user security and privacy, including the potential for metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages, spam, and phishing attacks. We will continue to make updates in the future to protect our users.

 

should be live for all over the next hour

 

There are reports on the pypush discord server that it is all but confirmed that Apple has changed something on the iMessage servers to block Beeper Mini users

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

James Gill is 16 years old, from Pennsylvania, and is now doing contract work for Beeper

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Forgive my ignorance, what do these Diabetes apps do?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago (8 children)

did you just watch The Matrix for the first time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No but I discovered this share sheet extension that does similarly: https://apps.apple.com/app/id1598706451

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

you’re right

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but presumably you’re getting social assistance, no? it’s sort of like a Basic Income

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It doesn’t only have one message… huh?

Anyway here’s some english language coverage: https://t.me/tginfochaten/85213

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What is “Wars” ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

You will own nothing, and you will love it! 😠

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I could borrow deep into this

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Like Reddit, lemmy is based around communities and hierarchical comments (plus downvoting).

Mastodon, like Twitter, is a single timeline from people you follow (and sometimes people they follow and repost), as well as hashtag searching etc. It has no downvote option, but thanks to ActivityPub you can post to lemmy from mastodon and liking something is equivalent to an upvote.

view more: ‹ prev next ›