capybara

joined 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Bryr mig inte om "nerduttar". Om mitt inlägg bryter mot reglerna kan det tas bort.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

feddit.nu är en instans jag blockerar för att den är skräp.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Jag vet, finns inget mer osvenskt än DN...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People are saying that this is a low percentage, but I think it could be considered high. Murder (i.e. not necessarily killing a human in general) is classically and in general a really bad thing. Even if people don't care for the parasitic company's CEO and might be glad that he's dead, I could imagine that their gut feeling would tell them to not consider an assassination acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

– Det är helt enkelt livsfarligt. Du vet ju inte var du kör, du kan ju köra på ett barn.

Är det inte illa nog att riskera att köra på en människa generellt? Varför måste man alltid blanda in barn för att väcka känslor hos folk?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Both of these posts are complaining about their accounts being banned, which happened because they (at least one of them) posted low effort questions and therefore got lots of downvotes and got automatically banned by a system meant to ban bots and trolls. The irony is that reddit has major problems with their automatic moderation which you yourself as an user is completely powerless to controll, e.g. recently when a massive amount of nsfw subreddits were banned for being unmoderated which they later admitted was erroneous.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It would be preferable if we didn't have to murder CEOs to stop them from destroying our lives but they are sort of forcing our hands here.