I miss single frame, subversion in the caption smbc.
ch00f
It feels good
I used to like this girl on my bus in 7th grade who lived in my neighborhood. I remember working on our family garden and thinking wouldn’t it be great if the girl biked over here and saw how hard I work.
Like this girl who barely knew me would randomly decide to visit my home when I happened to be working in the garden.
Unreal.
ITS MY MONEY AND I WANT IT NOW!
“We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”
-Kurt Vonnegut
The upper-most finger on the hand isn't an index finger. See where it lands on the palm? The original hand was pointing and they poorly shopped it to make it look like it was holding something cutting off the index finger.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Tellier reiterated that the purpose of the tax code was to tax net income, not punish unlawful behavior.
So...yes kind of.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxation_of_illegal_income_in_the_United_States
There's a reason why that guy completely rewriting Mario 64 to run at 60FPS on original hardware has said that he's never releasing it.
It's also possible that "We 4 You!" is the intended message. Like if it's that obvious, do you think the guy who had to add "prepare 4 launch" wouldn't have noticed it and fixed it? Clearly some post-processing happened here.
The fact that its even debatable if this is AI or not is concerning.
I find this argument a little disingenuous. Debatable is subjective. Someone might just have a really, really poor argument. Not much of a debate. Like depending on who you ask, the authenticity of the Moon landing is debatable.
Most of these "issues" are terrible arguments:
-
AI doesn't duplicate heads. That's kind of the whole point of AI. You know what does duplicate features? Lazy compositing.
-
It's a retro-future movie. That's a retro-future outfit.
-
and 9) Extras don't know how to use 70 year old props? This is surprising?
-
We're going to call out grammar errors, but ignore the flawless pencil drawing of the logo on the other poster?
Trump’s executive order banning all federal support for gender-affirming care for trans people under the age of 19, which among many things, threatens to withhold federal funds from hospitals that provide such care.
The family says they were told during a meeting with surgical center staff Tuesday morning that if the hospital lost access to those federal funds, other children’s care would be at risk, and the decision was made with the entire community's interest in mind.