chetradley

In a press release issued Wednesday by Arab Americans for Peace, the group said its members “appreciate the president’s offer to clean and rebuild Gaza” but “take issue with the president’s suggestion of taking over Gaza and removing its Palestinian inhabitants.”.

By "clean up", he literally means removing the Palestinians you absolute fucking morons.

I'm sorry, what did y'all think "Boston cream" was?

It's a pretty scary thought that with enough brain damage anyone can go MAGA.

No worries. Yeah props to the bus driver for sure. Just seeing this post without context or even a timeframe made me think people would get the impression that Greyhound was sticking it to the current administration, when they pretty much did the opposite and fucked over their passengers.

Nope. They allowed illegal searches for years until they were sued. This news is 5 years old.

Before you all go patting Greyhound on the back for this policy:

This is from 5 years ago.
They only changed their policy after being sued by the Washington State AG.
They were forced to pay $2.2 million for violating their customers rights by allowing Border Patrol to conduct warrantless searches in the first place.
It's estimated that 57,000 people were on Greyhound busses boarded by border patrol, in Spokane alone, from 2013-2020.

They're settling into those accusations of being state-affiliated media.

Add a CRT with a GameCube and a couple of madcatz controllers.

Likewise, have a great day.

I've actually been quite clear in the definition of life span I'm using. You appear to be intentionally misunderstanding my point.

The limits of the life span of each species appear to be determined ultimately by heredity. Locked within the code of the genetic material are instructions that specify the age beyond which a species cannot live given even the most favourable conditions.

https://www.britannica.com/science/life-span

Can you at least be consistent in your argument? On the one hand, you say that a species' lifespan in captivity can't be an indicator of their natural lifespan, because they wouldn't survive as long in the wild. On the other hand, you say that a livestock species' lifespan is dictated by when humans choose to slaughter them. Can you explain how these arguments don't contradict each other?

I'm happy to engage in a good faith conversation with you on this if you're interested.

Kind of a moot point since dairy cows, like the majority of animals raised for food, are man-made breeds and wouldn't exist in the wild anyway. But you knew I meant when I said natural lifespan, as in how long they'd live if they weren't killed as juveniles.

Tale as old as time.