It's almost as if the people making these decisions have never heard of compromised devices. Either that, or they're happy to have someone steal all your data and don't care.
danielquinn
The thing is, I'm still using my FP4 and it's going strong. I want to move to a newer, slimmer stronger device, but I can't justify it. Maybe Fairphone could get more people to upgrade if they had a return-to-resell practice. I could give them my FP4 and they'd take €100 off the FP6, then they'd resell the FP4 for €200 or something to someone who needs a phone.
Unfortunately, a rather substantial portion of warfare is the economics behind it. Often, spending eye-watering amounts of money on proprietary, overpriced hardware is the point. It's corporate welfare.
That's the thing, Trakata isn't making the case that it's in our best interest to be able to understand legislation. They're making the claim that they read a document they did not read to show support for legislation that's both authoritarian and supporting of government surveillance in a time when our biggest problems will be solved by neither.
Understanding complex legislation is a difficult, time-consuming job that requires experts in the field. Experts like those who work with the CCLA and professional journalists that parse this complexity and make it easier to consume for the rest of the nation. In the same way that while it's in every citizen's interest to have clean water, we're not expected to source and boil our own: we have experts who maintain water treatment facilities. Trakata's smug "I read the bill and I think it's great" line is both (a) a lie, and (b) a deception intended to distract from the dangers of the bill.
You don't get to decide who's Canadian, so I'm really not concerned about how my tone makes you feel. The guy/girl was straight-up lying to show support for authoritarianism and government surveillance. I will not apologise for pointing that out.
Because you didn't. You're lying and I'm 100% sure of it.
For those interested, this is the bill, an absolutely monstrous document which when read on its own doesn't even convey the full extent of the changes because much of it is a series of paragraph amendments to other laws made out of context. To really understand what's being proposed, one must first understand the current state of all laws being amended, so it's really this giant document ×20 or so.
So unless it's your job to parse these documents, or you wrote it yourself, you did not read it.
I also did not read it, but at least I'm being honest about that. I did however skim through it looking for confirmations of what was mentioned in the video. What I found was enough to convince me that the video is accurate. What's more, the author has done the work of a responsible journalist: he cited his sources in the video description. Sources which were in turn written by responsible people whose literal jobs are to understand these massive changes and compile them into documents the public understand. You know, journalism.
Maybe you read the summary, which is much easier to parse, though still ridiculously long, lacking context and glazing over important details. Even in there though, there are clear mentions of allowing the opening of your mail, so if you read that and are still somehow cool with it then... well I guess it's true that we're all condemned to repeat history 'cause some people just refuse to learn.
If you're genuinely curious, you should probably watch the video. He makes a pretty good case.
Yes, this is a list of US-owned papers. Note that the Toronto Star is not on it.
- The Toronto Star is not the Toronto Sun.
- The Star is owned by TorStar Media and is based in Toronto, Canada.
Delete this. It's misinformation. Leaving it up is a disservice.
TIL about using lsblk
instead of just reading through the output of journalctl
to find the disk and partitions. Thanks!
That was fantastically insightful.
No need to blame the Americans. Canada's got plenty of home-grown stupid.