danielquinn

joined 2 years ago
[–] danielquinn 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, you can buy it and use it in a general purpose fashion, and yeah, those cores would do wonders for all sorts of compiles. Also, it can be useful if you're like me and do a lot of Dockerised development. Given that most games are x86 only though, sadly this would be no good :-(

[–] danielquinn 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Ampre Altra runs from 32 to 128 cores (dear gods that's beautiful), but with that architecture, and the company's stated purpose, it makes more sense in a computer meant to be used as a server rather than a desktop gaming rig. You'd use a chip like that in a Kubernetes cluster for example.

Combined with an Nvidia card, a brand notorious for being a Pain In The Ass in Linuxland, I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the intended purpose of a box like this is a server for AI/ML-based services.

[–] danielquinn 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Before wading into the Wine waters, you might want to have a look at the Free and excellent Kdenlive. I've no experience with Filmora, but Kdenlive is surprisingly powerful.

[–] danielquinn 93 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I had the same reaction until I read this.

TL;DR: it's 10-50x more efficient at cleaning the air and actually generates both electricity and fertiliser.

Yes, it would be better to just get rid of all the cars generating the pollution in the first place and putting in some more trees, but there are clear advantages to this.

[–] danielquinn 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I see where you're trying to say here, but you're making the mistake of conflating conservatism with fascism. There may well be right leaning people and left-leaning people with similar IQs, but it requires a special degree of stupid and willful ignorance to believe the many, many lies that come out of the Trump Whitehouse.

[–] danielquinn 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's an Alberta riding that went 82% Conservative in the last election. It's highly unlikely.

[–] danielquinn 5 points 1 month ago

Naw, their metafriend will convince them otherwise. This timeline is gonna be awesome /s

[–] danielquinn 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is honestly one of the more concerning things Meta has come out with in years.

Social media giants have long since moved on from being the go-to companies for information about the public, and are now (with the help of "AI") moving solidly into the realm of injecting ideas into the public. Consider the implications of even 10% of the general public having regular conversations with their MetaFriend. They talk about their hobbies, their needs and wants, and all that data is obviously being collected, but these people have also handed Meta the ability to propose new ideas and change their viewpoint. Their "friend" is now in a position to drag them unknowingly into any political position Meta wants, and they can do this at scale.

That's enough to change public sentiment on nearly every issue. It's enough to sway elections.

[–] danielquinn 7 points 1 month ago

It's a little annoying how this was a lesson the Greens have had to learn twice. Elizabeth May ran repeatedly in her relatively Green-hostile home town and lost every time, but at some point, she and the party agreed that if we were going to get a seat, they'd have to do it by putting our leader in a riding she was likely to win. So, the party did a bunch of polling, and May uprooted her life and moved to Saanich Gulf Islands... where she's won every election since.

We can't just pick a leader — no matter how good he is (and he's pretty great, check out his Wikipedia page), and expect that he can run and win wherever he is. Not in this electoral system and not with the Green profile where it is. Any candidate interested in actually winning needs to be willing to move their life to a riding where they at least stand a chance. Maybe there's a soft (preferably Québéc) seat somewhere, but Outremont clearly isn't it.

[–] danielquinn 11 points 1 month ago

What a great idea!

[–] danielquinn 0 points 1 month ago

Um, 43% isn't a majority under any electoral system, and that number definitely represents a significant "strategic" vote, evidenced by way of the multiple strategic voting sites and endless posts on social media begging people not to "throw their vote away".

So this is objectively not a majority, but I fully expect Carney and his supporters to act as though it is. The job of the remaining smaller parties then is to remind him.

[–] danielquinn 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Honestly, this feels a little gross.

Too many people just spent the last 5 weeks demanding that everyone "hold their nose and vote Liberal to keep the Conservatives out", knowingly cratering support for the smaller parties, and now you turn around and are all like "we have to work together"?

Fuck. That.

We have common cause, but if the Liberals were serious about working together they would have embraced proportional representation. They didn't. They wanted domination, campaigning hard in Green & NDP ridings and even with the #ElbowsUp anti-Trump wave, Canadians still didn't want to trust them with a majority. It's not the role of the smaller parties to prop up the neoliberal "shit lite" party, it's to force them to do right by the country. I expect them to do that.

view more: ‹ prev next ›